UNIVERSI
TÄ
TS-
BIBLIOTHEK
P
ADERBORN
Anmelden
Menü
Menü
Start
Hilfe
Blog
Weitere Dienste
Neuerwerbungslisten
Fachsystematik Bücher
Erwerbungsvorschlag
Bestellung aus dem Magazin
Fernleihe
Einstellungen
Sprache
Deutsch
Deutsch
Englisch
Farbschema
Hell
Dunkel
Automatisch
Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist
gegebenenfalls
nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich.
mehr Informationen...
Universitätsbibliothek
Katalog
Suche
Details
Zur Ergebnisliste
Ergebnis 3 von 22
Datensatz exportieren als...
BibTeX
Diffusion-weighted imaging of the spinal cord: Interleaved echo-planar imaging is superior to fast spin-echo
Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2002-04, Vol.15 (4), p.364-373
Bammer, Roland
Augustin, Michael
Prokesch, Rupert W.
Stollberger, Rudolf
Fazekas, Franz
2002
Volltextzugriff (PDF)
Details
Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Bammer, Roland
Augustin, Michael
Prokesch, Rupert W.
Stollberger, Rudolf
Fazekas, Franz
Titel
Diffusion-weighted imaging of the spinal cord: Interleaved echo-planar imaging is superior to fast spin-echo
Ist Teil von
Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2002-04, Vol.15 (4), p.364-373
Ort / Verlag
New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
Erscheinungsjahr
2002
Quelle
MEDLINE
Beschreibungen/Notizen
Purpose To compare and evaluate two novel diffusion‐weighted sequences, based either on fast spin‐echo (FSE) or interleaved echo‐planar imaging (EPI) methods, as potential tools for investing spinal cord abnormalities. Materials and Methods Following recent improvements, both interleaved EPI (IEPI) and FSE techniques could be alternative approaches for rapid diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI). Therefore, a navigated diffusion‐weighted multishot FSE sequence and a fat‐suppressed navigated diffusion‐weighted IEPI sequence with local shimming capabilities were tested. Both methods were compared in a consecutive series of five healthy volunteers and five patients with suspected intramedullary lesions. The sequences were graded qualitatively as either superior, inferior, or equal in quality, and also quantitatively by measuring the amount of ghosting artifacts in the background. Quantitative measurements of the diffusion coefficients within the spine were included. Results The overall image quality of IEPI was superior to FSE. Two out of five FSE scans were rated with poor image quality, whereas all IEPI scans were of sufficient quality. The ghosting levels ranged from approximately 3.3% to 6.2% for IEPI and from approximately 7.5% to 18.9% for FSE. Diffusion coefficients measured in healthy volunteers were similar for both IEPI and FSE, but showed higher fluctuations with the FSE technique. Conclusion Despite potential advantages of FSE, the IEPI technique is preferable for DWI applications in the spinal cord. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2002;15:364–373. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 1053-1807
eISSN: 1522-2586
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.10075
Titel-ID: cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71594540
Format
–
Schlagworte
Diffusion
,
Echo-Planar Imaging
,
Female
,
FSE
,
Humans
,
IEPI
,
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
,
Quisotropy
,
spinal cord
,
Spinal Cord - anatomy & histology
,
Spinal Cord Diseases - diagnosis
Weiterführende Literatur
Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von
bX