Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Sitges, Marta
• Jones, Michael
• Shiota, Takahiro
• Prior, David L.
• Qin, Jian Xin
• Tsujino, Hiroyuki
• Bauer, Fabrice
• Kim, Yong Jin
• Deserranno, Dimitri
• Greenberg, Neil L.
• Cardon, Lisa A.
• Zetts, Arthur D.
• Garcia, Mario J.
• Thomas, James D.

Titel

Interaliasing distance of the flow convergence surface for determining mitral regurgitant volume: a validation study in a chronic animal model

Ist Teil von

• Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2001-10, Vol.38 (4), p.1195-1202

Ort / Verlag

United States: Elsevier Inc

Erscheinungsjahr

2001

Quelle

ScienceDirect

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• OBJECTIVES We aimed to validate a new flow convergence (FC) method that eliminated the need to locate the regurgitant orifice and that could be performed semiautomatedly. BACKGROUND Complex and time-consuming features of previously validated color Doppler methods for determining mitral regurgitant volume (MRV) have prevented their widespread clinical use. METHODS Thirty-nine different hemodynamic conditions in 12 sheep with surgically created flail leaflets inducing chronic mitral regurgitation were studied with two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography. Color Doppler M-mode images along the centerline of the accelerating flow towards the mitral regurgitation orifice were obtained. The distance between the two first aliasing boundaries (interaliasing distance [IAD]) was measured and the FC radius was mathematically derived according to the continuity equation (Rcalc= IAD/(1 − √v1/v2), v1and v2being the aliasing velocities). The conventional 2D FC radius was also measured (Rmeas). Mitral regurgitant volume was then calculated according to the FC method using both Rcalcand Rmeas. Aortic and mitral electromagnetic (EM) flow probes and meters were balanced against each other to determine the reference standard MRV. RESULTS Mitral regurgitant volume calculated from Rcalcand Rmeascorrelated well with EM-MRV (y = 0.83x + 5.17, r = 0.90 and y = 1.04x + 0.91, r = 0.91, respectively, p < 0.001 for both). However, both methods resulted in slight overestimation of EM-MRV (Δ was 3.3 ± 2.1 ml for Rcalcand 1.3 ± 2.3 ml for Rmeas). CONCLUSIONS Good correlation was observed between MRV derived from Rcalc(IAD method) and EM-MRV, similar to that observed with Rmeas(conventional FC method) and EM-MRV. The Rcalcusing the IAD method has an advantage over conventional Rmeasin that it does not require spatial localization of the regurgitant orifice and can be performed semiautomatedly.