Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Ruttan, Lesley, PhD, CPsych
• Martin, Krystle, MA
• Liu, Anita, HBSc
• Colella, Brenda, MA
• Green, Robin E., PhD, CPsych

Titel

Long-Term Cognitive Outcome in Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Meta-Analysis Examining Timed and Untimed Tests at 1 and 4.5 or More Years After Injury

Ist Teil von

• Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2008-12, Vol.89 (12), p.S69-S76

Ort / Verlag

United States: Elsevier Inc

Erscheinungsjahr

2008

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Abstract Ruttan L, Martin K, Liu A, Colella B, Green RE. Long-term cognitive outcome in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis examining timed and untimed tests at 1 and 4.5 or more years after injury. Objectives To examine long-term outcome of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) on timed and untimed cognitive tests using meta-analysis. Design Meta-analysis examining outcome at 2 epochs, 6 to 18 months postinjury (epoch 1) and 4.5 to 11 years postinjury (epoch 2). Setting Data source was published articles (1966–2007) identified through electronic and manual search. Participants A total of 1380 subjects with moderate to severe TBI participated in the 16 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Timed and untimed neuropsychologic tests with quantitative results (means, SDs, t , and df tests) from studies containing a healthy comparison group and a mean time since injury falling within 1 of the 2 epochs. Results Patient versus control weighted effect sizes were medium to large at epoch 1 for both untimed tasks ( r =−.46; confidence interval [CI], −.32 to −.65) and timed tasks ( r =−.46; CI, −.35 to −.59). At epoch 2, effect sizes were slightly smaller for untimed tasks ( r =−.38; CI, −.25 to −.60) and timed tasks ( r =−.40; CI, −.32 to −.62). Conclusions Patients showed robust, persisting impairments on both timed and untimed tests at recovery plateau (ie, 6–18mo postinjury) and many years later. These findings converge with previous studies, though using an alternative approach that obviates some of the methodologic problems of longitudinal studies, such as selective attrition.