Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Cosmetic and postmastectomy breast implants: Finnish women's experiences
Ist Teil von
Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine, 1999-09, Vol.8 (7), p.933-939
Ort / Verlag
United States
Erscheinungsjahr
1999
Quelle
MEDLINE
Beschreibungen/Notizen
The purpose of this study was to compare women's satisfaction with and short-term problems of silicone breast implants after cosmetic breast augmentation and after mastectomy. Women (n = 224) were recruited through advertising in mass media, and 91% responded to a questionnaire asking for their experiences, both positive and negative, with silicone breast implants. Approximately equal numbers of women received their implants for cosmetic reasons (augmentation group) and postmastectomy (113 and 111, respectively). Mean time from first implantation was 9 years (SD 7.3) in the cosmetic group and 8 years (SD 4.9) in the postmastectomy group. Women in the postmastectomy group received their implants at an older age than women in the cosmetic group (percent of women 45 and older, 59% and 3%, respectively). Women's overall preoperative knowledge of and postoperative satisfaction with their implants were similar in the two groups; 58% of women said that they had insufficient knowledge of breast implants preoperatively, 26% of women said they would not choose the implants again, and 44% of women expressed no dissatisfaction with their breasts. However, women in the cosmetic group were better informed about possible physical problems. One third of the women in the postmastectomy group had one or more reoperations, most frequently because of implant slippage (30%), encapsulation (26%), or implant size and shape (23%). Because insertion of breast implants is a lifelong decision, in-depth counseling about complication rates and possible risks should be given to women before implantation, and nonsurgical alternatives should be discussed, particularly for cosmetic implantation.