Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 19 von 111

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
A model to predict motor performance in preterm infants at 5 years
Ist Teil von
  • Early human development, 2009-09, Vol.85 (9), p.599-604
Ort / Verlag
Amsterdam: Elsevier Ireland Ltd
Erscheinungsjahr
2009
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
MEDLINE
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Abstract Background Approximately 60% of preterm infants who are assessed at 5 years for motor performance in a standardized multidisciplinary follow-up program are found to have normal results, indicating that, for these children, routine motor assessment at this age is unnecessary. Aim To improve the efficiency of our follow-up practice for motor assessment by developing a model to predict motor performance of preterm infants at 5 years with a maximal sensitivity (≥90%). Study design Longitudinal design. Subjects We included preterm infants ( n = 371) with a gestational age of ≤32 weeks; children with severe disabilities were excluded. Outcome measures The Movement Assessment Battery for Children (M-ABC) at 5 years with ‘delayed’ motor performance (<15 percentile) was the dependent variable. As factors in the model, we used twenty neonatal risk factors, the maternal education level, the Motor Scale and the Behavior Rating Scale (BRS) of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, 2nd edition, at 2½ years. Results Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that the prediction model ( n = 345) reached a sensitivity of 94%. Five factors contributed significantly ( p < 0.05) to the model: a Motor Scale PDI <90 and a BRS ‘motor quality’ <26 percentile, and the neonatal risk factors gestational age <30 weeks, male gender and intra-ventricular hemorrhage. Conclusion The prediction model can improve the efficiency of follow-up practice for motor assessment by 37% at 5 years. Applying this model, we would not have assessed 129 children and would have missed six children.

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX