Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
An alternative immunohistochemical method for detecting Leishmania amastigotes in paraffin-embedded canine tissues
Ist Teil von
Journal of immunological methods, 2004-09, Vol.292 (1), p.17-23
Ort / Verlag
Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V
Erscheinungsjahr
2004
Quelle
MEDLINE
Beschreibungen/Notizen
Canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL) is a zoonosis and a chronic systemic disease of the dog caused by a protozoan by the species
Leishmania infantum in the Old World and
Leishmania chagasi in the New World
. Several methods are currently employed for the diagnosis of CVL including microscopic detection of the parasite in bone marrow and lymph node aspirates, demonstration of specific antibodies anti-
Leishmania in sera from infected animals, and isolation of the parasite by in vitro culture or by inoculation of laboratory animals. However, a definitive diagnosis is based on the actual detection of the parasite, which is conventionally achieved by examining Giemsa-stained smears or histopathological sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin. These methods have a low sensitivity, and therefore, they are often inconclusive. This is particularly true in canine organs that have a low level of parasitism such as kidneys, lungs, central nervous system, and testis, or, in some cases, the skin. The technique for immunohistochemical detection of leishmanial amastigotes in canine tissues has been reported previously and has proved to be undoubtedly efficient for the diagnosis. In this paper, we describe a straightforward and inexpensive immunohistochemical approach for
Leishmania detection in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded canine tissues. Amastigote forms of
Leishmania were easily observed within macrophages in several organs from naturally infected dogs using the streptavidin–biotin immunohistochemical method with canine hyperimmune serum as the primary antibody. In addition, the secondary antibody used was not specific to canine immunoglobulin, characterizing a cross-immune reaction. Our results indicate that this technique could be a useful tool for epidemiological, clinical, and histopathological studies.