Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Allan Lind, E
• Huo, Yuen J
• Tyler, Tom R
• Roesch, Ronald

Titel

And Justice for All: Ethnicity, Gender, and Preferences for Dispute Resolution Procedures

Ist Teil von

• Law and human behavior, 1994-06, Vol.18 (3), p.269-290

Ort / Verlag

New York, N.Y: Plenum Publishing Corp

Erscheinungsjahr

1994

Quelle

SpringerLINK Contemporary (Konsortium Baden-Württemberg)

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• African American, Hispanic American, Asian American, and European American students rated their procedural preferences in response to a hypothetical conflict scenario and then recalled a real dispute in which they had been involved. Subjects of all four ethnicities and of both genders preferred persuasion and negotiation to other options. There were significant ethnic and gender differences in preferences, as well as differences for the nature of the relationship and the nature of the issue, but these differences were small in comparison to the overall pattern of procedural preferences. Reports of actual procedure use also showed differences in procedure use across genders, ethnicities, and relationship type, but the differences were relatively small. Procedural fairness was the strongest predictor of both procedural preference and affect toward actual procedure use.