Journal of peace research, 2003-11, Vol.40 (6), p.727-732
2003
Volltextzugriff (PDF)
Details
- Autor(en) / Beteiligte
- Titel
- All's Well That Ends Well: A Reply to Oneal, Barbieri & Peters
- Ist Teil von
- Journal of peace research, 2003-11, Vol.40 (6), p.727-732
- Ort / Verlag
- Oslo: Sage Publications
- Erscheinungsjahr
- 2003
- Quelle
- PAIS Index
- Beschreibungen/Notizen
- Oneal and Barbieri & Peters offer divergent critiques of Gartzke & Li, who present a mathematical identity between competing operationalizations of dyadic interdependence, and show that the relationship one finds between conflict and commerce depends on how one constructs one's dyadic indicator of trade. Oneal seems to accept the identity, but not some of its implications. Barbieri & Peters challenge the identity and offer contrasting results. Here, we show that Barbieri & Peters's results are due to their model specification, which Gartzke & Li argue involves omitted variable bias.
- Sprache
- Englisch
- Identifikatoren
- ISSN: 0022-3433eISSN: 1460-3578DOI: 10.1177/00223433030406008Titel-ID: cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60671967
- Format
- –
- Schlagworte
- Bias, Conflict, Debate, Dyadic relations, Dyadics, Economic liberalism, Economic models, Economics, Free trade, International Conflict, International relations, International Trade, Interstate conflict, Mathematical Models, Methodology, Peace, Politics, Ratios, Statistical Bias, Statistical variance, Trade, Trade gains