UNIVERSI
TÄ
TS-
BIBLIOTHEK
P
ADERBORN
Anmelden
Menü
Menü
Start
Hilfe
Blog
Weitere Dienste
Neuerwerbungslisten
Fachsystematik Bücher
Erwerbungsvorschlag
Bestellung aus dem Magazin
Fernleihe
Einstellungen
Sprache
Deutsch
Deutsch
Englisch
Farbschema
Hell
Dunkel
Automatisch
Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist
gegebenenfalls
nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich.
mehr Informationen...
Universitätsbibliothek
Katalog
Suche
Details
Zur Ergebnisliste
Ergebnis 4 von 781
Datensatz exportieren als...
BibTeX
The relative influence of advice from human experts and statistical methods on forecast adjustments
Journal of behavioral decision making, 2009-10, Vol.22 (4), p.390-409
Önkal, Dilek
Goodwin, Paul
Thomson, Mary
Gönül, Sinan
Pollock, Andrew
2009
Volltextzugriff (PDF)
Details
Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Önkal, Dilek
Goodwin, Paul
Thomson, Mary
Gönül, Sinan
Pollock, Andrew
Titel
The relative influence of advice from human experts and statistical methods on forecast adjustments
Ist Teil von
Journal of behavioral decision making, 2009-10, Vol.22 (4), p.390-409
Ort / Verlag
Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Erscheinungsjahr
2009
Quelle
Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】
Beschreibungen/Notizen
Decision makers and forecasters often receive advice from different sources including human experts and statistical methods. This research examines, in the context of stock price forecasting, how the apparent source of the advice affects the attention that is paid to it when the mode of delivery of the advice is identical for both sources. In Study 1, two groups of participants were given the same advised point and interval forecasts. One group was told that these were the advice of a human expert and the other that they were generated by a statistical forecasting method. The participants were then asked to adjust forecasts they had previously made in light of this advice. While in both cases the advice led to improved point forecast accuracy and better calibration of the prediction intervals, the advice which apparently emanated from a statistical method was discounted much more severely. In Study 2, participants were provided with advice from two sources. When the participants were told that both sources were either human experts or both were statistical methods, the apparent statistical‐based advice had the same influence on the adjusted estimates as the advice that appeared to come from a human expert. However when the apparent sources of advice were different, much greater attention was paid to the advice that apparently came from a human expert. Theories of advice utilization are used to identify why the advice of a human expert is likely to be preferred to advice from a statistical method. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 0894-3257
eISSN: 1099-0771
DOI: 10.1002/bdm.637
Titel-ID: cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37224706
Format
–
Schlagworte
advice
,
advice utilization
,
Behavioral decision theory
,
Behavioural economics
,
Decision theory
,
Economic forecasts
,
Experts
,
forecast adjustment
,
forecasting
,
Forecasting techniques
,
role of experts
,
Securities prices
,
source framing
,
Statistical methods
,
Studies
Weiterführende Literatur
Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von
bX