Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Peinado Molina, Rocio Adriana
• Martínez Vázquez, Sergio
• Martínez Galiano, Juan Miguel
• Rivera Izquierdo, Mario
• Khan, Khalid Saeed
• Cano‐Ibáñez, Naomi

Titel

Prevalence of depression and anxiety in women with pelvic floor dysfunctions: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Ist Teil von

• International journal of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024-06

Erscheinungsjahr

2024

Quelle

Wiley Online Library All Journals

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Abstract Background Female pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) is a common condition affecting the emotional well‐being of women. Objective To estimate the prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms in women with PFD. Search Strategy, Selection Criteria, Data Collection and Analysis Following prospective registration (PROSPERO CRD42022362095) we conducted a search of three electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus) from inception to April 2023 without language restriction to capture studies reporting the prevalence of depression/anxiety among women with PFD (chronic pelvic pain [CPP], urinary incontinence [UI], pelvic organ prolapse [POP], and/or fecal incontinence [FI]). Only studies with validated tools were included. Data extraction and study quality assessment were performed by two independent reviewers. Stratifying by type of PFD, rates of depression and anxiety were pooled using random effects model computing 95% confidence interval (CI) and assessing heterogeneity using the I 2 statistic. Funnel plots were used to detect potential reporting biases and small‐study effects. Main Results The search yielded 767 articles, from which 54 studies containing 632 605 women were included. All the studies were high quality. The prevalence of depression was: CPP 26.8% (95% CI: 19.2–34.4, I 2 = 98.7%; 12 studies, 4798 participants with 491 cases; Egger's P value = 0.009); UI 26.3% (95% CI: 19.4–33.2, I 2 = 99.9%; 26 studies, a total of 346 114 participants with 25 050 cases; Egger's P value = 0.944); POP 34.9% (95% CI: 24.3–45.6, I 2 = 68%; three studies, 297 participants with 104 cases; Egger's P value = 0.973); and FI 25.3% (95% CI: 0.68–49.9, I 2 = 99.7%; six studies, 14 663 participants with 1773 cases; Egger's P value = 0.780). The prevalence of anxiety was: CPP 29.5% (95% CI: 16.3–42.7, I 2 = 97.7%; nine studies, 2483 participants with 349 cases; Egger's P value = 0.001); UI 46.91% (95% CI: 39.1–54.6, I 2 = 99.6%; 11 studies, 198 491 participants with 40 058 cases; Egger's P value = 0.337); and POP 28% (95% CI: 13.6–42.4, I 2 = 89%; three studies with 355 participants with 90 cases; Egger's P value = 0.306). Conclusion The prevalence of mental health illness was variable in the different types of PFDs. This meta‐analysis helps quantify the burden of depression and anxiety in PFD and will help inform the policies regarding screening of emotional well‐being by healthcare professionals engaged in care of women with PFD. Synopsis This meta‐analysis helps quantify the burden of depression/anxiety in pelvic floor disease (PFD) and will help inform policies regarding screening of emotional well‐being of women with PFD.