Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Redinger, Allen L
• Russell, Jennifer L
• Allen, Shawn M F
• Baker, Breanne S

Titel

Height Restrictions for Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry: What Are Our Options for Body Composition and Bone Health Precision?

Ist Teil von

• Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2024-07, Vol.38 (7), p.e359-e365

Ort / Verlag

United States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies

Erscheinungsjahr

2024

Quelle

WK Lippincott Williams & Wilkins–Connect here FIRST to enable access

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Redinger, AL, Russell, JL, Allen, SMF, and Baker, BS. Height restrictions for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: what are our options for body composition and bone health precision? J Strength Cond Res 38(7): e359-e365, 2024-Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is commonly used for testing athlete's body composition, but many athletes are too tall. The first aim was to assess the viability of combining upper- and lower-body regions of interest (ROI), creating a combined scan for tall athletes who do not fit on the table and second, to provide practical solutions to DXA users who routinely scan tall athletes. Sixty subjects (34.8 ± 11.9 years; 171 ± 9 cm) completed 2 total-body DXA scans for baseline precision testing, using GE Lunar Prodigy (LP) or Hologic Horizon A (HA) models. Next, an upper body ROI from the skull to the distal femoral condyles was combined with a flipped scan (feet-to-head) ROI encompassing the proximal tibial plateau to the distal foot. Soft and bone tissue coefficient of variance (CV%) were calculated between the baseline scans and for the newly combined ROI scan. The combined ROI scan added 0.25-0.63% and 0.01-4.35% error rates for the LP and HA, respectively. An exploratory assessment of a GE Lunar iDXA demonstrated results similar to the HA with 4%+ error. The combined ROI scan is a user-friendly and precise method for older LP systems adding less than 1% error; however, newer DXA systems cannot use the stitched scan technique. Coaches and practitioners who use newer DXAs must prioritize consistently using the same boney landmarks (head, jaw, or feet) and ROI heights to provide precise longitudinal assessments of tall athletes' bone and body composition, until larger DXA tables become available.