Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Barça, Fatih
• Atilla, Halis Atıl
• Demir, Ekin Barış
• Çevik, Kadir
• Ilgın, Bünyamin Uğur
• Atlı, Osman Yağız
• Yüksel, Sinan
• Şibar, Kemal
• Ünlü, Serhan
• Duman, Evrim
• Fırat, Ahmet
• Akdoğan, Mutlu

Titel

Comparison of single and double incision leg fasciotomy in disaster settings—Experience from 2023 Türkiye earthquakes

Ist Teil von

• Injury, 2024-06, Vol.55 (6), p.111582-111582, Article 111582

Ort / Verlag

Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd

Erscheinungsjahr

2024

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Although there are studies comparing methods for leg fasciotomy in compartment syndrome after fractures, choice of single or double fasciotomies in disasters was not investigated. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of single and double incision leg fasciotomy in the setting of disaster. Patients that have undergone fasciotomy after 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes were retrospectively analyzed. The cases were separated into two groups as single incision and double incision according to the method of the first fasciotomy. The number of debridements after each fasciotomy, muscle group excisions, completion time of treatment, presence of amputation, the method of closure (primary closure or graft/flap) and positive results of wound cultures were analyzed and compared between two groups. 62 legs of 52 patients (22 females, 30 males, age 36.9 ± 11.2 years) with compartment syndrome that have undergone fasciotomy after 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes were included in the study. Single-incision group included 27 legs and double incision group included 35 legs. Amputation was needed in 15 patients (%24.2), six in single incision group and nine in double incision group. (p = 0.75). Compartment excision (eight patients in single incision, nine patients in double incision groups, p = 0.81), number of debridements (median 4 in both groups, p = 0.55), wound closure time (median 17 days in single incision, 22 days in double incision groups, p = 0.52), graft or flap requirement (11 patients in single incision, 16 patients in double incision groups, p = 0.53), positive culture results (15 patients in single incision, 16 patients in double incision groups, p = 0.44) were not different statistically between two groups. Single and double incision fasciotomy methods are equally effective and safe in treatment of compartment syndrome of the leg in disaster situations. To our knowledge, this is the first study comparing outcomes of single and double incision fasciotomy in disaster settings.