Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Gilbertson, Laura E.
• Muhly, Wallis T.
• Montana, Michael C.
• Chidambaran, Vidya
• DiCindio, Sabina
• Sadacharam, Kesavan
• Wilder, Robert T.
• Whyte, Simon D.
• Hifko, Alan
• Sponseller, Paul D.
• Frankville, David D.
• Allphin, Christopher
• Amin, Annie
• Austin, Thomas M.
• Bejar, Aimee
• Bielsky, Alan R.
• Brenn, Bruce R.
• Cassidy, Myles
• Chacko, Sabeena
• Csanyi‐Fritz, Yvonne
• Doshi, Anushree
• Frazee, Tiffany
• Gal, Jonathan S.
• Grigg, Eliot
• Haile, Dawit T.
• Hamrick, Jennie
• Handlogten, Kathryn
• Hoffmann, Cassandra
• Hunsberger, Joann
• Kamath, Aruna
• Ko, Riva
• Lefevre, Ashley
• Lynch, Lisa R.
• Martinez, Jose Luis
• McCann, Mary E.
• Mishal, Jason
• Moore, Robert
• Nguyen, Thanh
• Njoku, Dolores B.
• Ojo, Bukola
• Ok, Michale
• Pinyavat, Teeda
• Patel, Ronak
• Spisak, Kristen
• Stemland, Chis J.
• Stondell, Casey
• Sunder, Rani
• Tumber, Sundeep
• Yung, Francoise

Titel

A survey of practice in the anesthetic management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis spine fusion by the North American Pediatric Spine Anesthesiologists Collaborative

Ist Teil von

• Pediatric anesthesia, 2024-07, Vol.34 (7), p.645-653

Ort / Verlag

France: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc

Erscheinungsjahr

2024

Quelle

Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Background Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) affects 2%–4% of the general pediatric population. While surgical correction remains one of the most common orthopedic procedures performed in pediatrics, limited consensus exists on the perioperative anesthetic management. Aims To examine the current state of anesthetic management of typical AIS spine fusions at institutions which have a dedicated pediatric orthopedic spine surgeon. Methods A web‐based survey was sent to all members of the North American Pediatric Spine Anesthesiologists (NAPSA) Collaborative. This group included 34 anesthesiologists at 19 different institutions, each of whom has a Harms Study Group surgeon performing spine fusions at their hospital. Results Thirty‐one of 34 (91.2%) anesthesiologists completed the survey, with a missing response rate from 0% to 16.1% depending on the question. Most anesthesia practices (77.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 67.7–93.4) do not have patients come for a preoperative visit prior to the day of surgery. Intravenous induction was the preferred method (74.2%; 95% CI 61.3–89.9), with the majority utilizing two peripheral IVs (93.5%; 95% CI 90.3–100) and an arterial line (100%; 95% CI 88.8–100). Paralytic administration for intubation and/or exposure was divided (51.6% rocuronium/vecuronium, 45.2% no paralytic, and 3.2% succinylcholine) amongst respondents. While tranexamic acid was consistently utilized for reducing blood loss, dosing regimens varied. When faced with neuromonitoring signal issues, 67.7% employ a formal protocol. Most anesthesiologists (93.5%; 95% CI 78.6–99.2) extubate immediately postoperatively with patients admitted to an inpatient floor bed (77.4%; 95% CI 67.7–93.3). Conclusion Most anesthesiologists (87.1%; 95% CI 80.6–99.9) report the use of some form of an anesthesia‐based protocol for AIS fusions, but our survey results show there is considerable variation in all aspects of perioperative care. Areas of agreement on management comprise the typical vascular access required, utilization of tranexamic acid, immediate extubation, and disposition to a floor bed. By recognizing the diversity of anesthetic care, we can develop areas of research and improve the perioperative management of AIS.