Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Hoang, Anh Quoc
• Tue, Nguyen Minh
• Goto, Akitoshi
• Karyu, Ryogo
• Tuyen, Le Huu
• Viet, Pham Hung
• Matsukami, Hidenori
• Suzuki, Go
• Takahashi, Shin
• Kunisue, Tatsuya

Titel

Bioaccessibility of halogenated flame retardants and organophosphate esters in settled dust: Influences of specific dust matrices from informal e-waste and end-of-life vehicle processing areas in Vietnam

Ist Teil von

• The Science of the total environment, 2024-05, Vol.926, p.172045-172045, Article 172045

Ort / Verlag

Netherlands: Elsevier B.V

Erscheinungsjahr

2024

Link zum Volltext

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Bioaccessibility of halogenated flame retardants (HFRs) and organophosphorus esters (OPEs) is necessarily investigated to provide more accurate risk assessment and information about absorption behavior of these pollutants. In this study, total and bioaccessible concentrations of HFRs (including legacy and alternative substances) and OPEs were determined in settled dust samples collected from Vietnamese e-waste and end-of-life vehicle (ELV) processing areas. Concentrations of both HFRs and OPEs were significantly higher in the e-waste dust than ELV dust. Bioavailability of HFRs and OPEs in dust was determined by using an in vitro assay with human-simulated digestive fluids, dialysis membrane, and Tenax® TA sorptive sink. Bioaccessibility of HFRs was markedly lower than that of OPEs, which could be largely due to higher hydrophobicity of HFRs compared to OPEs. Bioaccessibility of almost hydrophobic compounds were markedly lower in the e-waste dust (containing micronized plastic debris) than in the ELV dust (containing oily materials), suggesting the influence of specific dust matrices on pollutant bioaccessibility. Although the daily uptake doses of selected HFRs and OPEs from dust were markedly higher in the e-waste sites compared to the ELV sites, the direct exposure risk was not significant. Our results suggest that bioaccessibility can partly explain the differences between dust and uptake profiles, which may relate to accumulation profiles of HFRs and OPEs in human samples. [Display omitted] •Bioaccessibility of HFRs and OPEs in waste workshop dust was determined by PBET tests.•OPEs exhibited higher bioaccessibility than HFRs due to their higher hydrophilicity.•HFRs and OPEs in e-waste dust were less bioaccessible than in ELV dust.•Specific dust matrices (e.g. plastic debris, oils) affect pollutant bioaccessibility.•Bioaccessibility can partly explain the differences between dust and uptake profiles.