Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 3 von 11
Water research (Oxford), 2002-09, Vol.36 (15), p.3860-3866
2002
Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Aerobic waste activated sludge (WAS) for start-up seed of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion
Ist Teil von
  • Water research (Oxford), 2002-09, Vol.36 (15), p.3860-3866
Ort / Verlag
Oxford: Elsevier Ltd
Erscheinungsjahr
2002
Quelle
Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect (DFG Nationallizenzen)
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Since there are very limited numbers of thermophilic anaerobic digesters being operated, it is often difficult to start up a new one using sludge from an existing reactor as a seed. However, for obvious reasons it seems few attempts have been made to compare the start-up performance of thermophilic anaerobic digestion using different sources of seed sludges. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the start-up performance of anaerobic digestion using aerobic waste activated sludge (WAS) from a plant which has no anaerobic digesters and mesophilic anaerobic digested sludge (ADS) as the seed source at both mesophilic (35°C) and thermophilic (55°C) temperatures. In this study, two experiments were conducted. First, thermophilic anaerobic reactors were seeded with WAS (VSS=4400 mg/L) and ADS (VSS=14,500 mg/L) to investigate start-up performance with a feed of acetate as well as propionate. The results show that WAS started to produce CH 4 soon after acetate feeding without a lag time, while ADS had a lag time of 10 days. When the feed was changed to propionate, WAS removed propionate down to below the detection limit of 10 mg/L, while ADS removed little propionate and produced little CH 4. Second, in order to further compare the methanogenic activity of WAS and ADS, both mesophilic and thermophilic reactors were operated. WAS acclimated to anaerobic conditions shortly (<5 days at both mesophilic and thermophilic) and after acclimating it produced more CH 4 per unit amount of seeded VSS than ADS. WAS at mesophilic temperature biodegraded acetate at the same rate as for thermophilic. However WAS at mesophilic temperature biodegraded propionate at a much faster rate than at thermophilic. WAS as the seed source of anaerobic digestion resulted in much better performance than ADS at both mesophilic and thermophilic temperatures for both acetate and propionate metabolism.

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX