Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Cheng, Yifeng
• Zhao, Guangrui
• Chen, Lei
• Cui, Deqiu
• Wang, Chunjuan
• Feng, Keke
• Yin, Shaoya

Titel

Effects of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation using different frequency programming paradigms on axial symptoms in advanced Parkinson’s disease

Ist Teil von

• Acta neurochirurgica, 2024-03, Vol.166 (1), p.124-124, Article 124

Ort / Verlag

Vienna: Springer Vienna

Erscheinungsjahr

2024

Quelle

SpringerLink

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Background In advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD), axial symptoms are common and can be debilitating. Although deep brain stimulation (DBS) significantly improves motor symptoms, conventional high-frequency stimulation (HFS) has limited effectiveness in improving axial symptoms. In this study, we investigated the effects on multiple axial symptoms after DBS surgery with three different frequency programming paradigms comprising HFS, low-frequency stimulation (LFS), and variable-frequency stimulation (VFS). Methods This study involved PD patients who had significant preoperative axial symptoms and underwent bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS. Axial symptoms, motor symptoms, medications, and quality of life were evaluated preoperatively (baseline). One month after surgery, HFS was applied. At 6 months post-surgery, HFS assessments were performed, and HFS was switched to LFS. A further month later, we conducted LFS assessments and switched LFS to VFS. At 8 months after surgery, VFS assessments were performed. Results Of the 21 PD patients initially enrolled, 16 patients were ultimately included in this study. Regarding HFS, all axial symptoms except for the Berg Balance Scale ( p  < 0.0001) did not improve compared with the baseline (all p  > 0.05). As for LFS and VFS, all axial symptoms improved significantly compared with both the baseline and HFS (all p  < 0.05). Moreover, motor symptoms and medications were significantly better than the baseline (all p  < 0.05) after using LFS and VFS. Additionally, the quality of life of the PD patients after receiving LFS and VFS was significantly better than at the baseline and with HFS (all p  < 0.0001). Conclusion Our findings indicate that HFS is ineffective at improving the majority of axial symptoms in advanced PD. However, both the LFS and VFS programming paradigms exhibit significant improvements in various axial symptoms.