Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Giglio, Vinicius J.
• Aued, Anaide W.
• Cordeiro, Cesar A. M. M.
• Eggertsen, Linda
• S. Ferrari, Débora
• Gonçalves, Leandra R.
• Hanazaki, Natalia
• Luiz, Osmar J.
• Luza, André L.
• Mendes, Thiago C.
• Pinheiro, Hudson T.
• Segal, Bárbara
• Waechter, Luiza S.
• Bender, Mariana G.

Titel

A Global Systematic Literature Review of Ecosystem Services in Reef Environments

Ist Teil von

• Environmental management (New York), 2024-03, Vol.73 (3), p.634-645

Ort / Verlag

New York: Springer US

Erscheinungsjahr

2024

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Ecosystem services (ES) embrace contributions of nature to human livelihood and well-being. Reef environments provide a range of ES with direct and indirect contributions to people. However, the health of reef environments is declining globally due to local and large-scale threats, affecting ES delivery in different ways. Mapping scientific knowledge and identifying research gaps on reefs’ ES is critical to guide their management and conservation. We conducted a systematic assessment of peer-reviewed articles published between 2007 and 2022 to build an overview of ES research on reef environments. We analyzed the geographical distribution, reef types, approaches used to assess ES, and the potential drivers of change in ES delivery reported across these studies. Based on 115 articles, our results revealed that coral and oyster reefs are the most studied reef ecosystems. Cultural ES (e.g., subcategories recreation and tourism) was the most studied ES in high-income countries, while regulating and maintenance ES (e.g., subcategory life cycle maintenance) prevailed in low and middle-income countries. Research efforts on reef ES are biased toward the Global North, mainly North America and Oceania. Studies predominantly used observational approaches to assess ES, with a marked increase in the number of studies using statistical modeling during 2021 and 2022. The scale of studies was mostly local and regional, and the studies addressed mainly one or two subcategories of reefs’ ES. Overexploitation, reef degradation, and pollution were the most commonly cited drivers affecting the delivery of provisioning, regulating and maintenance, and cultural ES. With increasing threats to reef environments, the growing demand for assessing the contributions to humans provided by reefs will benefit the projections on how these ES will be impacted by anthropogenic pressures. The incorporation of multiple and synergistic ecosystem mechanisms is paramount to providing a comprehensive ES assessment, and improving the understanding of functions, services, and benefits.