Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Davis, Alissa
• Stringer, Kristi Lynn
• Drainoni, Mari-Lynn
• Oser, Carrie B.
• Knudsen, Hannah K.
• Aldrich, Alison
• Surratt, Hilary L.
• Walker, Daniel M.
• Gilbert, Louisa
• Downey, Dget L.
• Gardner, Sam D.
• Tan, Sylvia
• Lines, Lisa M.
• Vandergrift, Nathan
• Mack, Nicole
• Holloway, JaNae
• Lunze, Karsten
• McAlearney, Ann Scheck
• Huerta, Timothy R.
• Goddard-Eckrich, Dawn A.
• El-Bassel, Nabila

Titel

Community-level determinants of stakeholder perceptions of community stigma toward people with opioid use disorders, harm reduction services and treatment in the HEALing Communities Study

Ist Teil von

• The International journal of drug policy, 2023-12, Vol.122, p.104241-104241, Article 104241

Ort / Verlag

Netherlands: Elsevier B.V

Erscheinungsjahr

2023

Quelle

Alma/SFX Local Collection

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• •Few quantitative studies have examined factors associated with community OUD stigma.•Data from 66 urban and rural communities in four states were analyzed.•Perceived community OUD stigma was higher among rural than urban stakeholders.•No differences were found in community OUD stigma by racialized segregation or social inequity.•Programs and policies to reduce community stigma, especially in rural areas, are needed. Community stigma toward people with opioid use disorder (OUD) can impede access to harm reduction services and treatment with medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Such community OUD stigma is partially rooted in community-level social and economic conditions, yet there remains a paucity of large-scale quantitative data examining community-level factors associated with OUD stigma. We examined whether rurality, social inequity, and racialized segregation across communities from four states in the HEALing Communities Study (HCS) were associated with 1) greater perceived community stigma toward people treated for OUD, 2) greater perceived intervention stigma toward MOUD, and 3) greater perceived intervention stigma toward naloxone by community stakeholders in the HCS. From November 2019-January 2020, a cross-sectional survey about community OUD stigma was administered to 801 members of opioid overdose prevention coalitions across 66 communities in four states prior to the start of HCS intervention activities. Bivariate analyses assessed pairwise associations between community rural/urban status and each of the three stigma variables, using linear mixed effect modeling to account for response clustering within communities, state, and respondent sociodemographic characteristics. We conducted similar bivariate analyses to assess pairwise associations between racialized segregation and social inequity. On average, the perceived community OUD stigma scale score of stakeholders from rural communities was 4% higher (β=1.57, SE=0.7, p≤0.05), stigma toward MOUD was 6% higher (β=0.28, SE=0.1, p≤0.05), and stigma toward naloxone was 10% higher (β=0.46, SE=0.1, p≤0.01) than among stakeholders from urban communities. No significant differences in the three stigma variables were found among communities based on racialized segregation or social inequity. Perceived community stigma toward people treated for OUD, MOUD, and naloxone was higher among stakeholders in rural communities than in urban communities. Findings suggest that interventions and policies to reduce community-level stigma, particularly in rural areas, are warranted.