Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Saez-Clarke, Estefany
• Otto, Amy K.
• Prinsloo, Sarah
• Natori, Akina
• Wagner, Richard W.
• Gomez, Telma I.
• Ochoa, Jewel M.
• Tworoger, Shelley S.
• Ulrich, Cornelia M.
• Hathaway, Cassandra A.
• Peoples, Anita R.
• Antoni, Michael H.
• Bower, Julienne E.
• Cohen, Lorenzo
• Penedo, Frank J.

Titel

Development and initial psychometric evaluation of a COVID-related psychosocial experiences questionnaire for cancer survivors

Ist Teil von

• Quality of life research, 2023-12, Vol.32 (12), p.3475-3494

Ort / Verlag

Cham: Springer International Publishing

Erscheinungsjahr

2023

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Background Cancer survivors are at elevated risk of psychological problems related to COVID-19, yet no published measure adequately assesses their psychosocial experiences during the pandemic. Purpose Describe the development and factor structure of a comprehensive, self-report measure (COVID-19 Practical and Psychosocial Experiences questionnaire [COVID-PPE]) assessing the pandemic’s impact on US cancer survivors. Methods The sample (n = 10,584) was divided into three groups to assess COVID-PPE factor structure by conducting: (1) initial calibration/exploratory analysis of the factor structure of 37 items (n = 5070), (2) confirmatory factor analysis of the best-fitting model (36 items after item removal; n = 5140), and (3) post-hoc confirmatory analysis with an additional six items not collected in the first two groups (42 items; n = 374). Results The final COVID-PPE was divided into two sets of subscales, conceptualized as Risk Factors and Protective Factors. The five Risk Factors subscales were labeled Anxiety Symptoms, Depression Symptoms, Health Care Disruptions, Disruptions to Daily Activities and Social Interactions, and Financial Hardship. The four Protective Factors subscales were labeled Perceived Benefits, Provider Satisfaction, Perceived Stress Management Skills, and Social Support. Internal consistency was acceptable for seven subscales (αs = 0.726–0.895; ωs = 0.802–0.895) but poor or questionable for the remaining two subscales (αs = 0.599–0.681; ωs = 0.586–0.692). Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first published self-report measure comprehensively capturing psychosocial impact—both positive and negative—of the pandemic on cancer survivors. Future work should evaluate predictive utility of COVID-PPE subscales, particularly as the pandemic evolves, which may inform recommendations for cancer survivors and facilitate identification of survivors most in need of intervention.