Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Contrella, Benjamin N.
• Khaja, Minhajuddin S.
• Majdalany, Bill S.
• Kim, Charles Y.
• Kalva, Sanjeeva P.
• Beck, Adam W.
• Browne, William F.
• Clough, Rachel E.
• Ferencik, Maros
• Fleischman, Fernando
• Gunn, Andrew J.
• Hickey, Sean M.
• Kandathil, Asha
• Kim, Karen M.
• Monroe, Eric J.
• Ochoa Chaar, Cassius Iyad
• Scheidt, Matthew J.
• Smolock, Amanda R.
• Steenburg, Scott D.
• Waite, Kathleen
• Pinchot, Jason W.
• Steigner, Michael L.

Titel

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm or Dissection: Treatment Planning and Follow-Up

Ist Teil von

• Journal of the American College of Radiology, 2023-05, Vol.20 (5), p.S265-S284

Ort / Verlag

United States: Elsevier Inc

Erscheinungsjahr

2023

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• As the incidence of thoracoabdominal aortic pathology (aneurysm and dissection) rises and the complexity of endovascular and surgical treatment options increases, imaging follow-up of patients remains crucial. Patients with thoracoabdominal aortic pathology without intervention should be monitored carefully for changes in aortic size or morphology that could portend rupture or other complication. Patients who are post endovascular or open surgical aortic repair should undergo follow-up imaging to evaluate for complications, endoleak, or recurrent pathology. Considering the quality of diagnostic data, CT angiography and MR angiography are the preferred imaging modalities for follow-up of thoracoabdominal aortic pathology for most patients. The extent of thoracoabdominal aortic pathology and its potential complications involve multiple regions of the body requiring imaging of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis in most patients. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.