Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Saniasiaya, Jeyasakthy
• Islam, Md. Asiful
• Salim, Rosdan

Titel

The global prevalence of vestibular dysfunction in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ist Teil von

• European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology, 2023-06, Vol.280 (6), p.2663-2674

Ort / Verlag

Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Erscheinungsjahr

2023

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Background Vestibular dysfunction has been extensively studied amongst the older population. Recently, conditions and management of vestibular dysfunction among children and adolescent has gained attention. Yet, a lack of awareness and expertise in managing children and adolescents with vestibular dysfunction has led to a delay in diagnosis as well as a trifling prevalence rate. Aim To conduct a systematic review and meta-analyses to estimate the overall pooled prevalence of vestibular dysfunction in children and adolescents. Methods PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify studies published until 29 April 2022. We used a random‐effects model to estimate the pooled prevalence with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using the  I 2  statistic and Cochran's Q test. The robustness of the pooled estimates was checked by different subgroups and sensitivity analyses. Results We identified 1811 studies, of which 39 studies ( n  = 323,663) were included in the meta‐analysis. Overall, the pooled prevalence of children and adolescents with VD was 30.4% [95% CI 28.5–32.3%]. The age of the participants ranged from 1 to 19 years. Participants of the included 39 studies were from 15 countries. Among the studies, 34 were cross-sectional, and five were case–control designed. There were discrepancies found in the studies with objective (higher prevalence) versus subjective (lower prevalence) evaluations. Conclusion The prevalence of VD among children and adolescents was found to be 30.4% based on high-quality evidence. Due to the subjective assessment of most studies pooled in the analysis, the results should be interpreted cautiously until future comparative studies with objective assessments are carried out.