Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• DuPlessis, Danielle
• Lam, Emily
• Xie, Lucy
• Reed, Nick
• Wright, F. Virginia
• Biddiss, Elaine
• Scratch, Shannon E.

Titel

Multi-domain assessment of sports-related and military concussion recovery: A scoping review

Ist Teil von

• Physical therapy in sport, 2023-01, Vol.59, p.103-114

Ort / Verlag

England: Elsevier Ltd

Erscheinungsjahr

2023

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• This review explores the literature on multi-domain assessments used in concussion recovery, to inform evidence-based and ecologically valid return-to-play. It asks: What simultaneous, dynamic multi-domain paradigms are used to assess recovery of youth and adults following concussion? Five databases were searched (CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycInfo, SPORTDiscus) until September 30, 2021. Records were limited to those published in peer-reviewed journals, in English, between 2002 and 2021. Included studies were required to describe the assessment of concussion recovery using dynamic paradigms (i.e., requiring sport-like coordination) spanning multiple domains (i.e., physical, cognitive, socio-emotional functioning) simultaneously. 7098 unique articles were identified. 64 were included for analysis, describing 36 unique assessments of 1938 concussed participants. These assessments were deconstructed into their constituent tasks: 13 physical, 17 cognitive, and one socio-emotional. Combinations of these “building blocks” formed the multi-domain assessments. Forty-six studies implemented level walking with a concurrent cognitive task. The most frequently implemented cognitive tasks were ‘Q&A′ paradigms requiring participants to answer questions aloud during a physical task. A preference emerged for dual-task assessments, specifically combinations of level walking and Q&A tasks. Future research should balance ecological validity and clinical feasibility in multi-domain assessments, and work to validate these assessments for practice. •Clinicians need better tools to assess the combined demands of sport on athletes.•Most paradigms were dual-tasks requiring level walking and a concurrent Q&A task.•Few assessments were sport-like in physical, cognitive, and socio-emotional demand.•All assessments faced barriers to implementation in clinic.•Future research should aim to balance ecological validity and clinical feasibility.