Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 5 von 284
International journal of law and psychiatry, 2022-07, Vol.83, p.101809-101809, Article 101809
2022
Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Rational capacity and criminal responsibility in the USA
Ist Teil von
  • International journal of law and psychiatry, 2022-07, Vol.83, p.101809-101809, Article 101809
Ort / Verlag
Elsevier Ltd
Erscheinungsjahr
2022
Quelle
Alma/SFX Local Collection
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • The United States Supreme Court recently found that an insanity defense based upon moral incapacity was not constitutionally required. This decision allows states with a moral incapacity insanity defense, i.e., most states, to abolish their insanity defense. Unfortunately, the Court's opinion was based upon conflated concepts without considering irrationality, traditionally and universally the indispensable core element of insanity standards. This present perspective review attempts to clarify and disambiguate the critical concepts of instrumental and rational capacities as applied to insanity standards. With a proper understanding and application of these distinctly different capacities, insanity standards that at least incorporate rationality should in the future meet the Court's touchstone for determining constitutionally required due process.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 0160-2527
eISSN: 1873-6386
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2022.101809
Titel-ID: cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2681048834

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX