Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Hoeh, Benedikt
• Flammia, Rocco S.
• Hohenhorst, Lukas
• Sorce, Gabriele
• Chierigo, Francesco
• Panunzio, Andrea
• Tian, Zhe
• Saad, Fred
• Gallucci, Michele
• Briganti, Alberto
• Terrone, Carlo
• Shariat, Shahrokh F.
• Graefen, Markus
• Tilki, Derya
• Antonelli, Alessandro
• Kluth, Luis A.
• Becker, Andreas
• Chun, Felix K. H.
• Karakiewicz, Pierre I.

Titel

Outcomes of robotic‐assisted versus open radical cystectomy in a large‐scale, contemporary cohort of bladder cancer patients

Ist Teil von

• Journal of surgical oncology, 2022-09, Vol.126 (4), p.830-837

Ort / Verlag

United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc

Erscheinungsjahr

2022

Quelle

Wiley-Blackwell Full Collection

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Background and Objectives To test for differences in perioperative outcomes and total hospital costs (THC) in nonmetastatic bladder cancer patients undergoing open (ORC) versus robotic‐assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). Methods We relied on the National Inpatient Sample database (2016–2019). Statistics consisted of trend analyses, multivariable logistic, Poisson, and linear regression models. Results Of 5280 patients, 1876 (36%) versus 3200 (60%) underwent RARC versus ORC. RARC increased from 32% to 41% (estimated annual percentage change [EAPC]: + 8.6%; p = 0.02). Rates of transfusion (8% vs. 16%), intraoperative (2% vs. 3%), wound (6% vs. 10%), and pulmonary (6% vs. 10%) complications were lower in RARC patients (all p < 0.05). Moreover, median length of stay (LOS) was shorter in RARC (6 vs. 7days; p < 0.001). Conversely, median THC (31,486 vs. 27,162$; p < 0.001) were higher in RARC. Multivariable logistic regression‐derived odds ratios addressing transfusion (0.49), intraoperative (0.53), wound (0.68), and pulmonary (0.71) complications favored RARC (all p < 0.01). In multivariable Poisson and linear regression models, RARC was associated with shorter LOS (Rate ratio:0.86; p < 0.001), yet higher THC (Coef.:5,859$; p < 0.001). RARC in‐hospital mortality was lower (1% vs. 2%; p = 0.04). Conclusions RARC complications, LOS, and mortality appear more favorable than ORC, but result in higher THC. The favorable RARC profile contributes to its increasing popularity throughout the United States.