Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 11 von 43

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Efficacy of psychological interventions on clinical outcomes of coronary artery disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis
Ist Teil von
  • Journal of psychosomatic research, 2022-02, Vol.153, p.110710-110710, Article 110710
Ort / Verlag
England: Elsevier Inc
Erscheinungsjahr
2022
Quelle
Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Psychological factors influence clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Therefore, psychological interventions (PIs) may have beneficial effects in these patients. We evaluated the efficacy of PIs based on cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and positive psychology therapy (PPT) on clinical and laboratory outcomes in CAD. Randomized controlled trials evaluating CBT or PPT in CAD patients published until May 2020 were systematically reviewed and analyzed. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, any cardiovascular event, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, coronary revascularization, angina, and readmission. Random effects meta-analyses using the inverse variance method were performed. Effects were expressed as risk ratios (RR) or standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Twenty-five trials were included (n = 8119); 22 evaluating the effects of multi-component CBT (n = 7909), and three PPT (n = 210). Thirteen RCTs were at high risk of bias due to limitations in randomization or blinding. Compared with control groups any cardiovascular event (RR 0.82; 0.70 to 0.97; 5 studies), MI (RR 0.72; 0.52 to 0.98; 9 studies), and angina duration and intensity (SMD -0.64; −0.98 to −0.30; 4 studies; and −0.64; −1.17 to −0.11; 2 trials) were significantly reduced with PIs at the end of follow-up. PIs had no effect on other primary outcomes, laboratory or anthropometrical results and presented a moderate to high heterogeneity. CBT- and PPT-based PIs reduce the risk of cardiovascular events, MI and angina in patients with CAD. Future research should assess the individual role of CBT and PPT in CAD populations. •Only evidence-based standardized CBT and PPT PIs in CAD patients are included.•It is the first systematic review to include PIs based on positive psychology.•PIs based on CBT or PPT reduced new CV events and MI risk, and angina in CAD.•Specific type on PI may be important to enhance mental and physical health benefits.•CBT and PPT should be included in cardiac rehabilitation as complementary treatment.

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX