Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Schrepel, Caitlin
• Amick, Ashley E.
• Bann, Maralyssa
• Watsjold, Bjorn
• Jauregui, Joshua
• Ilgen, Jonathan S.
• Sebok‐Syer, Stefanie S.

Titel

Who's on your team? Specialty identity and inter‐physician conflict during admissions

Ist Teil von

• Medical education, 2022-06, Vol.56 (6), p.625-633

Ort / Verlag

England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc

Erscheinungsjahr

2022

Quelle

Psychology & Behavioral Sciences Collection

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Purpose Despite the implementation of professionalism curricula and standardised communication tools, inter‐physician conflict persists. In particular, the interface between emergency medicine (EM) and internal medicine (IM) has long been recognised as a source of conflict. The social nuances of this conflict remain underexplored, limiting educators' ability to comprehensively address these issues in the clinical learning environment. Thus, the authors explored EM and IM physicians' experiences with negotiating hospital admissions to better understand the social dynamics that contribute to inter‐physician conflict and provide foundational guidance for communication best practices. Methods Using a constructivist grounded theory (CGT) approach, the authors conducted 18 semi‐structured interviews between June and October 2020 with EM and IM physicians involved in conversations regarding admissions (CRAs). They asked participants to describe the social exchanges that influenced these conversations and to reflect on their experiences with inter‐physician conflict. Data collection and analysis occurred iteratively. The relationships between the codes were discussed by the research team with the goal of developing conceptual connections between the emergent themes. Results Participants described how their approaches to CRAs were shaped by their specialty identity, and how allegiance to members of their group contributed to interpersonal conflict. This conflict was further promoted by a mutual sense of disempowerment within the organisation, misaligned expectations, and a desire to promote their group's prerogatives. Conflict was mitigated when patient care experiences fostered cross‐specialty team formation and collaboration that dissolved traditional group boundaries. Conclusions Conflict between EM and IM physicians during CRAs was primed by participants' specialty identities, their power struggles within the broader organisation, and their sense of duty to their own specialty. However, formation of collaborative inter‐specialty physician teams and expansion of identity to include colleagues from other specialties can mitigate inter‐physician conflict. The authors explored how group alliance, or specialty identity, primes conversations between physicians in moments of conflict, emphasizing the importance of uniting as one team to care for the patient.