Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Goldberg, Ellen M.
• Berger, Yaniv
• Sood, Divya
• Kurnit, Katherine C.
• Kim, Josephine S.
• Lee, Nita K.
• Yamada, S. Diane
• Turaga, Kiran K.
• Eng, Oliver S.

Titel

Differences in Sociodemographic Disparities Between Patients Undergoing Surgery for Advanced Colorectal or Ovarian Cancer

Ist Teil von

• Annals of surgical oncology, 2021-11, Vol.28 (12), p.7795-7806

Ort / Verlag

Cham: Springer International Publishing

Erscheinungsjahr

2021

Quelle

Alma/SFX Local Collection

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Background Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for ovarian cancer with peritoneal metastases (OPM) is an established treatment, yet access-related racial and socioeconomic disparities are well documented. CRS for colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases (CRPM) is garnering more widespread acceptance, and it is unknown what disparities exist with regards to access. Methods This retrospective cross-sectional multicenter study analyzed medical records from the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2015. Patients diagnosed with CRPM or ORP only and either no or confirmed resection were included. Patient- and facility-level characteristics were analyzed using uni- and multivariable logistic regressions to identify associations with receipt of CRS. Results A total of 6634 patients diagnosed with CRPM and 14,474 diagnosed with OPM were included in this study. Among patients with CRPM, 18.1% underwent CRS. On multivariable analysis, female gender (odds ratio [95% CI] 2.04 [1.77–2.35]; P < 0.001) and treatment at an academic or research facility (OR 1.55 [1.17–2.05]; P = 0.002) were associated with CRS. Among patients with OPM, 87.1% underwent CRS. On multivariable analysis, treatment at facilities with higher-income patient populations was positively associated with CRS, while age (OR 0.97 [0.96–0.98]; P < .0001), use of nonprivate insurance (OR 0.69 [0.56–0.85]; P = 0.001), and listed as Black (OR 0.62 [0.45–0.86]; P = 0.004) were negatively associated with CRS. Conclusion There were more systemic barriers to CRS for patients with OPM than for patients with CRPM. As CRS becomes more widely practiced for CRPM, it is likely that more socioeconomic and demographic barriers will be elucidated.