Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Wang, Hongshi
• Klosterhalfen, Bernd
• Müllen, Andreas
• Otto, Thomas
• Dievernich, Axel
• Jockenhövel, Stefan

Titel

Degradation resistance of PVDF mesh in vivo in comparison to PP mesh

Ist Teil von

• Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2021-07, Vol.119, p.104490-104490, Article 104490

Ort / Verlag

Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd

Erscheinungsjahr

2021

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Mesh implant has been applied in hernia repair and urogynecological reconstruction. Polypropylene (PP) is now the most widely used material for non-resorbable mesh implants. A degradation phenomenon of PP mesh, which is apparent on the mesh surface as cracking, flaking and peeling, was discovered in the 1990's. This phenomenon of mesh implant has drawn attention because of mesh-related litigations. Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), due to its high biocompatible performance, has been used since 2003 as an alternative material for non-resorbable mesh implants. Till now, no such degradation phenomenon of PVDF mesh has been reported, although limited study on PVDF mesh is available. In this paper, we researched the degradation of PVDF meshes taking the degradation of PP mesh as a reference. The meshes analysed in this study were received from a previous animal experiment. To expose the surface of explanted meshes, a tissue removing method with protease was used and the result of this cleaning process was tested by X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS). The morphological condition of the mesh surface was compared using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and the chemical condition concerning degradation was analysed through Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). The surface condition of PVDF mesh after 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-month implantation was illustrated and compared with two types of PP meshes. XPS revealed an absence of nitrogen, confirming the successful removal of tissue residues using protease. SEM results presented no notable morphological surface change of the PVDF mesh and progressive surface cracking processes over time of both types of PP meshes. FTIR spectra of the implanted PVDF meshes had no considerable difference from the spectrum of the pristine mesh, while FTIR spectra of both types of PP meshes had extra chemical functional groups (carbonyl (CO) and hydroxyl (-OH) groups) increasing with implantation time, indicating progressive degradation. This study highlights the morphological and chemical stability of the PVDF mesh and demonstrates that the PVDF mesh is more resistant to degradation in comparison to the other two types of PP meshes. •PVDF mesh is more resistant to degradation in vivo in comparison to PP mesh.•PVDF mesh undergoes no considerable morphological or chemical change up to 24 months after implantation.•A time-dependent progressive degradation behavior of PP mesh is shown.•Mesh preparation with protease is sufficient for removing biological tissue.