Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Gausden, Elizabeth B.
• Beiene, Zodina A.
• Blevins, Jason L.
• Christ, Alexander B.
• Chalmers, Brian P.
• Helfet, David L.
• Sculco, Peter K.
• Mayman, David J.

Titel

Periprosthetic Femur Fractures After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Does the Mode of Failure Correlate With Classification?

Ist Teil von

• The Journal of arthroplasty, 2021-07, Vol.36 (7), p.2597-2602

Ort / Verlag

United States: Elsevier Inc

Erscheinungsjahr

2021

Quelle

Alma/SFX Local Collection

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Periprosthetic femur fracture is one of the most common indications for reoperation after total hip arthroplasty. Our objectives were to evaluate the incidence of reoperation after the surgical treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures and to compare the mechanisms of failure between fractures around a stable femoral component and those with an unstable femoral component. We identified a consecutive series of 196 surgically treated periprosthetic fractures after total hip arthroplasty between 2008 and 2017. Mean age was 72 years (range, 29-96 years), and 108 (55%) were women. The femoral component was unstable in 127 cases (65%) and stable in the remaining 69 cases (35%). Mean follow-up was 2 years. The 2-year cumulative probability of any reoperation was 19%. The most common indication for reoperation among the cases with a stable femoral component was nonunion, and the most common indication for reoperation among the cases with an unstable femoral component was infection. Fractures that originated at the distal aspect of the femoral component were associated with a high risk of nonunion (6 of 28 cases, P < .01) and reoperation (9 of 28 cases, P = .03). Surgeons should take measures to mitigate the failure modes that are distinct based on fracture type. The high infection rate after surgical management of B2 fracture suggests that additional antiseptic precautions may be warranted. For B1 fractures, particularly those originating near the distal aspect of the femoral component, augmenting fixation with orthogonal plating, spanning the entire femur, or revising the stem in cases of poor proximal bone should be considered.