Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 17 von 78798
British journal of educational psychology, 2021-09, Vol.91 (3), p.972-996
2021
Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Implicit theories of self‐regulated learning: Interplay with students’ achievement goals, learning strategies, and metacognition
Ist Teil von
  • British journal of educational psychology, 2021-09, Vol.91 (3), p.972-996
Ort / Verlag
England: Wiley
Erscheinungsjahr
2021
Quelle
Psychology & Behavioral Sciences Collection
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Background Implicit theories are important belief systems that influence an individual’s motivation and behaviour. In academic contexts, domain‐general implicit theories of ability (e.g., intelligence) and their relation to self‐regulated learning (SRL) have been examined. Aims In this study, we followed a domain‐specific approach and first introduced scales to assess students’ implicit theories of the malleability and of the relevance of SRL. Second, we investigated how implicit theories of SRL are related to students’ SRL. Third, we examined the relationship of implicit theories of SRL with students’ demographics and personality traits. Sample Participants were students from a medium‐sized university in Germany (N = 254) aged M = 23.85 years. Methods Data on students’ demographics and personality traits, implicit theories of intelligence (INT), achievement goals, and learning strategies were collected with well‐established measures. In addition, students’ implicit theories of SRL and their declarative metacognitive knowledge about SRL were assessed with measures developed within this study. Confirmatory factor analyses and regression analyses were performed. Results The two postulated dimensions of implicit theories of SRL were supported. As expected, implicit theories of SRL were more strongly related to students’ achievement goals, learning strategies, and metacognitive knowledge than implicit theories of INT. Moreover, implicit theories of SRL were mostly unrelated to students’ demographics and personality traits. Conclusion The results emphasize that domain‐specific implicit theories of SRL contribute substantially to the explanation of students’ SRL. Thus, further research on SRL should consider domain‐specific implicit theories of SRL in addition to implicit theories of INT.

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX