Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Maconochie, Ian K
• Aickin, Richard
• Hazinski, Mary Fran
• Atkins, Dianne L
• Bingham, Robert
• Couto, Thomaz Bittencourt
• Guerguerian, Anne-Marie
• Nadkarni, Vinay M
• Ng, Kee-Chong
• Nuthall, Gabrielle A
• Ong, Gene Y.K
• Reis, Amelia G
• Schexnayder, Stephen M
• Scholefield, Barnaby R
• Tijssen, Janice A
• Nolan, Jerry P
• Morley, Peter T
• Van de Voorde, Patrick
• Zaritsky, Arno L
• de Caen, Allan R

Titel

Pediatric Life Support: 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations

Ist Teil von

• Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 2020-10, Vol.142 (16_suppl_1 Suppl 1), p.S140-S184

Ort / Verlag

United States: by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc

Erscheinungsjahr

2020

Quelle

EZB Electronic Journals Library

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• This 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations (CoSTR) for pediatric life support is based on the most extensive evidence evaluation ever performed by the Pediatric Life Support Task Force. Three types of evidence evaluation were used in this reviewsystematic reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence updates. Per agreement with the evidence evaluation recommendations of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation, only systematic reviews could result in a new or revised treatment recommendation.Systematic reviews performed for this 2020 CoSTR for pediatric life support included the topics of sequencing of airway-breaths-compressions versus compressions-airway-breaths in the delivery of pediatric basic life support, the initial timing and dose intervals for epinephrine administration during resuscitation, and the targets for oxygen and carbon dioxide levels in pediatric patients after return of spontaneous circulation. The most controversial topics included the initial timing and dose intervals of epinephrine administration (new treatment recommendations were made) and the administration of fluid for infants and children with septic shock (this latter topic was evaluated by evidence update). All evidence reviews identified the paucity of pediatric data and the need for more research involving resuscitation of infants and children.