Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Su, Xin
• Zhao, Xin
• Long, De‐yong
• Sang, Cai‐hua
• Yu, Rong‐hui
• Tang, Ri‐bo
• Bai, Rong
• Liu, Nian
• Jiang, Chen‐xi
• Li, Song‐nan
• Guo, Xue‐yuan
• Wang, Wei
• Hu, Rong
• Du, Xin
• Dong, Jian‐zeng
• Ma, Chang‐sheng

Titel

Safety and efficacy of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in abdominal solid organ (renal and hepatic) transplant recipients: A single‐center pilot experience

Ist Teil von

• Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2020-12, Vol.31 (12), p.3141-3149

Ort / Verlag

United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc

Erscheinungsjahr

2020

Quelle

Alma/SFX Local Collection

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in abdominal solid organ transplant recipients and a cause of morbidity and mortality in this population. However, the outcomes of catheter ablation (CA) in transplant recipients with AF remain unclear. This study aimed to elucidate the outcomes of CA in renal and hepatic transplant recipients. Methods and Results Between 2015 and 2019, 14 transplant recipients (nine with kidney transplantation and five with liver transplantation) were enrolled from among 10,741 AF patients and underwent CA at Anzhen Hospital. Another 56 patients matched by age, sex, and AF type were selected as the control group (four controls for each transplant recipient). During a mean follow‐up of 30.0 ± 13.3 months after the initial procedure, 10 (71.4%) of the transplant patients, compared to 41 (73.2%) of the control patients, remained free from AF recurrence (p = 1.000). A repeated procedure was performed in one transplant patient and in six control subjects. Consequently, 11 (78.6%) of the transplant patients, compared to 46 (82.1%) of controls, were in sinus rhythm after the repeated ablation (p = .715). Notably, Kaplan–Meier analysis did not demonstrate any significant differences in the atrial arrhythmia‐free rate after the initial and repeated procedure between the two groups. Vascular complications were identified in one transplant patient and two control subjects, while no life‐threatening complications were observed in either group. There was no transient allograft dysfunction in transplant recipients after CA. Conclusion CA is safe and effective in abdominal solid transplant recipients, and maybe an optimal therapeutic strategy for this group.