Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Palese, Alvisa
• Bottega, Michela
• Cescutti, Alice
• Caruzzo, Davide
• Danielis, Matteo
• Fabris, Stefano
• Mattiussi, Elisa
• Grassetti, Luca

Titel

Depicting clinical nurses' priority perspectives leading to unfinished nursing care: A pilot Q methodology study

Ist Teil von

• Journal of nursing management, 2020-11, Vol.28 (8), p.2146-2156

Ort / Verlag

England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc

Erscheinungsjahr

2020

Link zum Volltext

Quelle

Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Aims To highlight (a) trends common to all nurses on priorities attributed to interventions, and (b) whether there are profiles of nurses working in the same context who prioritize interventions in a similar way. Background The underlying prioritization of interventions leading to unfinished nursing care has been minimally investigated. Methods A 2017 pilot Q methodology study. Full‐time nurses, with at least 6 months of experience in a surgical unit, were involved. Eleven nurses rated the priority given in daily practice (from −3 as the lowest to +3 as the highest) to 35 Q‐sample statements representing nursing care, non‐nursing and organisational interventions. Results Overall, the intervention receiving the lowest priority was ‘Providing patient hygiene’, while the highest was ‘Answering phone calls’. In the by‐person factor analysis (total variance = 60.79%), three profiles of nurses emerged, (a) ‘Patient safety‐oriented’ (variance = 31.66%); (b) ‘Nursing task‐oriented’ (=16.32%); and (c) ‘Team process‐oriented’ (=12.81%). Conclusions Three profiles of nurses emerged in the same setting with significant differences both in the statistical order of priorities and in their practical implications. Implications for nursing management Understanding levels of prioritization, which are not only affected by the unit but also by sub‐groups of nurses who rank priorities in a similar way, can support nurse managers in their role.