Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Soar, Naomi
• Birns, Jonathan
• Sommerville, Peter
• Lang, Alex
• Archer, Sally

Titel

Approaches to Eating and Drinking with Acknowledged Risk: A Systematic Review

Ist Teil von

• Dysphagia, 2021-02, Vol.36 (1), p.54-66

Ort / Verlag

New York: Springer US

Erscheinungsjahr

2021

Quelle

Alma/SFX Local Collection

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Background Patients with dysphagia may consider eating and drinking with acknowledged risk (EDAR) instead of artificial hydration/nutrition. Timely consideration of complex issues is required including dysphagia reversibility, risk/benefit discussions, patient wishes, their capacity and best interests. Objective This study aimed to establish if EDAR protocols improve care through a systematic literature review with a secondary aim to explore important factors for the development and success of a protocol. Methods PUBMED, MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMBASE were searched for English language articles to May 2019 with terms related to EDAR, dysphagia and end of life. Articles were agreed for inclusion by three independent reviewers. Levels of evidence were assessed using the modified Sackett scale. Study themes were identified and discussed. Results 8 articles met the inclusion criteria with varied methodology. The highest level of evidence was III (cohort study). Most were limited to patients with dementia, stroke, in older person’s wards or residential homes. Three articles described a systematic approach to EDAR for in-patients, reporting reductions in days nil-by-mouth until feeding plans are made and improvements in documentation of decision making, nutrition plans and capacity assessment. Five papers explored the views and knowledge of staff, patients and families/carers relating to EDAR and complex feeding decisions. Formal meta-analysis was not possible due to the level and mix of methodology. Conclusion There is a paucity of evidence to determine if EDAR protocols improve care. However, support is emerging for a coordinated approach to managing EDAR. Findings suggest having a protocol is not enough; training and communication within teams is essential, together with incorporating feedback from patients and carers, and this justifies further work.