Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...

Technische Störung

Das Bibliothekssystem ALMA ist derzeit von einer weltweiten Störung von IT-Diensten betroffen. Aktuell besteht kein Zugriff auf die Bibliothekskonten der Nutzer*innen. Somit sind z.B. keine Vormerkungen, Fristverlängerungen und Bestellungen von Medien aus dem Magazin möglich.

Wir bitten um Ihr Verständnis.

Ergebnis 15 von 150

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Diagnostic yield of EUS-guided through-the-needle biopsy in pancreatic cysts: a meta-analysis
Ist Teil von
  • Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2020-07, Vol.92 (1), p.1-8.e3
Ort / Verlag
United States: Elsevier Inc
Erscheinungsjahr
2020
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
MEDLINE
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • There is currently limited evidence supporting the use of EUS-guided through-the-needle biopsy for sampling pancreatic cystic lesions. The aim of this meta-analysis was to provide a pooled estimate of the diagnostic performance of through-the-needle biopsy for sampling of pancreatic cysts. A bibliographic search on the main databases was performed in September 2019. Pooled effects were calculated using a random-effects model by means of the DerSimonian and Laird test. The primary outcome was sample adequacy. Additional endpoints were diagnostic accuracy, optimal histologic core procurement, mean number of needle passes, pooled specificity, and sensitivity. Adverse event rates were also analyzed. Eleven studies enrolling 490 patients were included. Eight articles compared through-the-needle biopsy with cytology/cystic fluid analysis. Most patients were female, and the body/tail was the most frequent location of cystic lesions. Sample adequacy with through-the-needle biopsy was 85.3% (78.2%-92.5%), and subanalysis performed according to cyst morphology, size, and location confirmed the result. Through-the-needle biopsy clearly outperformed FNA both in terms of sample adequacy (odds ratio, 4.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.63-14.31; P =.004) and diagnostic accuracy (odds ratio, 3.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-8.96; P =.01). The pooled diagnostic accuracy rate, sensitivity, and specificity of through-the-needle biopsy were 78.8%, 82.2%, and 96.8%, respectively. A mean of 3.121 (2.98-3.25) passes through the cyst was needed to obtain adequate histologic samples. The incidence rates of mild bleeding and pancreatitis were 4% and 2%, respectively. Our meta-analysis speaks in favor of the use of through-the-needle biopsy as a safe and effective tool in EUS-guided tissue acquisition of pancreatic cysts.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 0016-5107
eISSN: 1097-6779
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.01.038
Titel-ID: cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2350911242

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX