Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Rutting, S
• Mahadev, S
• Tonga, K O
• Bailey, D L
• Dame Carroll, J R
• Farrow, C E
• Thamrin, C
• Chapman, D G
• King, G G

Titel

Obesity alters the topographical distribution of ventilation and the regional response to bronchoconstriction

Ist Teil von

• Journal of applied physiology (1985), 2020-01, Vol.128 (1), p.168-177

Ort / Verlag

United States

Erscheinungsjahr

2020

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Obesity is associated with reduced operating lung volumes that may contribute to increased airway closure during tidal breathing and abnormalities in ventilation distribution. We investigated the effect of obesity on the topographical distribution of ventilation before and after methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction using single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)-computed tomography (CT) in healthy subjects. Subjects with obesity ( = 9) and subjects without obesity ( = 10) underwent baseline and postbronchoprovocation SPECT-CT imaging, in which Technegas was inhaled upright and followed by supine scanning. Lung regions that were nonventilated (Vent ), low ventilated (Vent ), or well ventilated (Vent ) were calculated using an adaptive threshold method and were expressed as a percentage of total lung volume. To determine regional ventilation, lungs were divided into upper, middle, and lower thirds of axial length, derived from CT. At baseline, Vent and Vent for the entire lung were similar in subjects with and without obesity. However, in the upper lung zone, Vent (17.5 ± 10.6% vs. 34.7 ± 7.8%, < 0.001) and Vent (25.7 ± 6.3% vs. 33.6 ± 5.1%, < 0.05) were decreased in subjects with obesity, with a consequent increase in Vent (56.8 ± 9.2% vs. 31.7 ± 10.1%, < 0.001). The greater diversion of ventilation to the upper zone was correlated with body mass index (  = 0.74, < 0.001), respiratory system resistance (  = 0.72, < 0.001), and respiratory system reactance (  = -0.64, = 0.003) but not with lung volumes or basal airway closure. Following bronchoprovocation, overall Vent increased similarly in both groups; however, in subjects without obesity, Vent only increased in the lower zone, whereas in subjects with obesity, Vent increased more evenly across all lung zones. In conclusion, obesity is associated with altered ventilation distribution during baseline and following bronchoprovocation, independent of reduced lung volumes. Using ventilation SPECT-computed tomography imaging in healthy subjects, we demonstrate that ventilation in obesity is diverted to the upper lung zone and that this is strongly correlated with body mass index but is independent of operating lung volumes and of airway closure. Furthermore, methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction only occurred in the lower lung zone in individuals who were not obese, whereas in subjects who were obese, it occurred more evenly across all lung zones. These findings show that obesity-associated factors alter the topographical distribution of ventilation.