Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Contrasting common measures of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal root colonization
Ist Teil von
Journal of microbiological methods, 2019-12, Vol.167, p.105727-105727, Article 105727
Ort / Verlag
Netherlands: Elsevier B.V
Erscheinungsjahr
2019
Quelle
Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
Beschreibungen/Notizen
Estimating the abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi relies entirely on indirect methods, meaning all measures are associated with some variability. The most common methods use microscopic estimates of the relative proportion of root length colonized by fungal structures. These methods typically examine root subsamples. While such methods are inexpensive and relatively simple, significant variation within single root system means there is opportunity for sampling bias. We evaluated the two most common methods of percent root length colonization for AM fungi both as a subsample and for the entire root system of flax plants. We compared these measures to a novel technique that returns projected fungal surface area (fungal coverage), by using microphotography and imaging analysis. Both microscopic methods overestimated the colonization intensity compared to image analysis. Among the microscopic methods, the method which incorporated colonization intensity (Trouvelot) was significantly more similar to imaging method results, than the method that is based on the presence/absence of the fungus (McGonigle).
•Trouvelot and McGonigle are among the most commonly used methods for AM fungal colonization assessment.•We compared the two methods to a novel microphotography and imaging analysis technique.•Both methods were prone to misestimation of colonization intensity.•Trouvelot was closer to the imaging method results compared to McGonigle.