Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2021-12, Vol.35 (12), p.3500-3505
2021
Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Training Progression in Recreational Cyclists: No Linear Dose-Response Relationship With Training Load
Ist Teil von
  • Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2021-12, Vol.35 (12), p.3500-3505
Ort / Verlag
United States: Copyright by the National Strength & Conditioning Association
Erscheinungsjahr
2021
Quelle
MEDLINE
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • ABSTRACTVermeire, KM, Vandewiele, G, Caen, K, Lievens, M, Bourgois, JG, and Boone, J. Training progression in recreational cyclistsno linear dose-response relationship with training load. J Strength Cond Res XX(X)000–000, 2019—The purpose of the study was to assess the relationship between training load (TL) and performance improvement in a homogeneous group of recreational cyclists, training with a self-oriented training plan. Training data from 11 recreational cyclists were collected over a 12-week period. Before and after the training period, subjects underwent a laboratory incremental exercise test with blood lactate measurements to determine the power output associated with the aerobic threshold (PAT) and the anaerobic threshold (PANT), and the maximal power output (PMAX) was also determined. Mean weekly TL (calculated using the training impulse (TRIMP) of Banister, Edwards TRIMP, Lucia TRIMP and the individualized TRIMP) were correlated to the progression in fitness parameters using Pearson Correlation. Training intensity distribution (TID) was also determined (% in zone 1 as <AT; % in zone 2 as between AT and ANT; % in zone 3 as >ANT). No significant correlations between mean weekly TRIMP values and the improvement on PMAX (r = −0.22 to 0.08), PANT (r = −0.56 to −0.31) and PAT (r = −0.08 to 0.41) were found. The TID was significant in a multiple regression with PANT as dependent variable (y = 0.0088 + 0.1094 × Z1 − 0.2704 × Z2 + 1.0416 × Z3; p = 0.02; R = 0.62). In conclusion, this study shows that the commonly used TRIMP methods to quantify TL do not show a linear dose-response relationship with performance improvement in recreational cyclists. Furthermore, the study shows that TID might be a key factor to establish a relationship with performance improvement.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 1064-8011
eISSN: 1533-4287
DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003340
Titel-ID: cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2287514842

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX