Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Yu, Fiona
• Raphael, Deborah
• Mackay, Lisa
• Smith, Melody
• King, Anna

Titel

Personal and work-related factors associated with nurse resilience: A systematic review

Ist Teil von

• International journal of nursing studies, 2019-05, Vol.93, p.129-140

Ort / Verlag

England: Elsevier Ltd

Erscheinungsjahr

2019

Quelle

Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Nursing shortages have profoundly impacted hospitals and consequently increased financial expenditure, resulting in work overload, thus augmenting nurses’ stress and burnout levels. Studies have found that resilience helps nurses reduce the effects of stress and burnout. However, the factors associated with nurse resilience are yet to be determined. This systematic review aims to identify the associated personal and work-related factors of nurse resilience. This systematic review has been registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (Registered Number: CRD 42018094080). Results are reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol. The systematic search was undertaken between March and April 2018 in five databases: CINAHL Plus, MEDLINE (Ovid), PsycINFO, EMBASE, and Scopus. The searched terms combined in each database were: resilience, hardiness, work, employ, occupation, job, and nursing. Full-text English articles published between 2000 and 2018 were included. Studies were also included if they involved: (1) nurses who provided direct patient care, (2) resilience and its associated factors, (3) an empirical quantitative study, and (4) a quality assessment grade of ‘good’ or ‘fair’. Two authors carried out the study eligibility and quality assessment independently. A narrative synthesis was utilised following the Job Demands-Resources model to identify the factors of job demands and resources, which were associated with nurse resilience. A total of 38 articles met the criteria and were systematically reviewed and narratively synthesised. Various resilience scales utilised in these studies made it unfeasible to synthesise the evidence using a meta-analysis. Inconsistencies exist when examining personal and work-related factors. Job demands (stress, burnout, posttraumatic stress disorder, and workplace bullying) were negatively associated with resilience, while job resources (coping skills, self-efficacy, social support, job satisfaction, job retention, and general wellbeing) were positively related to resilience. Using a quality assessment tool, 23 studies were rated as ‘Good’, 15 were assessed as ‘Fair’, and 20 were found to have a risk of bias. Understanding nurse resilience can proactively help nurses identify or prevent potential problems, thus fostering job resources and ultimately achieving personal and professional growth. Increased nurse resilience can help nurses reduce emotional exhaustion, increase work engagement, and enhance function when facing workplace challenges. This can assist nurses to establish strategies to deal with adversity and attenuate the effects of job demands. Further research is needed to explore nurse resilience and develop a consistent instrument for measuring resilience.