Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Kondo, Naru
• Uemura, Kenichiro
• Nakagawa, Naoya
• Okada, Kenjiro
• Kuroda, Shintaro
• Sudo, Takeshi
• Hadano, Naoto
• Matstukawa, Hiroyoshi
• Satoh, Daisuke
• Sasaki, Masaru
• Abe, Tomoyuki
• Fukuda, Saburo
• Oshita, Akihiko
• Nakashima, Akira
• Hashimoto, Yasushi
• Ohdan, Hideki
• Murakami, Yoshiaki

Titel

A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Reinforced Staplers with Bare Staplers During Distal Pancreatectomy (HiSCO-07 Trial)

Ist Teil von

• Annals of surgical oncology, 2019-05, Vol.26 (5), p.1519-1527

Ort / Verlag

Cham: Springer International Publishing

Erscheinungsjahr

2019

Link zum Volltext

Quelle

SpringerLink

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Background Although distal pancreatectomy (DP) using a reinforced stapler is expected to reduce PF, no multicenter RCT has been performed. To investigate whether reinforced staplers reduce the incidence of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (PF) after DP compared with staplers without reinforcement. Methods Between July 2016 and December 2017, patients scheduled for DP were enrolled in a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial (RCT) at nine hospitals in Hiroshima Japan. Patients were randomized either to reinforced stapler or bare stapler. The primary endpoint was incidence of clinically relevant PF. This RCT was registered with UMIN Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN000022341). Results A total of 122 patients were assigned to reinforced stapler ( n  = 61) or bare stapler ( n  = 61), and 119 patients (61 reinforced stapler and 59 bare stapler) were analyzed. There was no significant difference in the incidence of clinically relevant PF between the reinforced stapler and bare stapler groups (16.3% vs. 27.1%, p  = 0.15). Furthermore, the rates of major complication (16.3% vs. 18.6%, p  = 0.74), postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (0% vs. 3.4%, p  = 0.08), and median postoperative in-hospital days (19 days vs. 20 days, p  = 0.78) did not differ between the two groups. Within a subset of 82 patients in whom the thickness of pancreatic transection line was less than 14 mm, a significant difference was found in the incidence of clinically relevant PF (4.5% vs. 21.0% in the reinforced stapler vs. bare stapler groups, respectively, p  = 0.01). Conclusions Reinforced stapler for pancreatic transection during DP does not reduce the incidence of clinically relevant PF compared to stapler without reinforcement.