Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Clarke, G. M.
• Holloway, C. M. B.
• Zubovits, J. T.
• Nofech-Mozes, S.
• Murray, M.
• Liu, K.
• Wang, D.
• Kiss, A.
• Yaffe, M. J.

Titel

Three-dimensional tumor visualization of invasive breast carcinomas using whole-mount serial section histopathology: implications for tumor size assessment

Ist Teil von

• Breast cancer research and treatment, 2019-04, Vol.174 (3), p.669-677

Ort / Verlag

New York: Springer US

Erscheinungsjahr

2019

Quelle

Alma/SFX Local Collection

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Purpose Linear tumor size (T-size) estimated with conventional histology informs breast cancer management. Previously we demonstrated significant differences in margin and focality estimates using conventional histology versus digital whole-mount serial sections (WMSS). Using WMSS we can measure T-size or volume. Here, we compare WMSS T-size with volume, and with T-size measured conventionally. We also compare the ellipsoid model for calculating tumor volume to direct, WMSS measurement. Methods Two pathologists contoured regions of invasive carcinoma and measured T-size from both WMSS and (simulated) conventional sections in 55 consecutive lumpectomy specimens. Volume was measured directly from the contours. Measurements were compared using the paired t -test or Spearman’s rank-order correlation. A five-point ‘border index’ was devised and assigned to each case to parametrize tumor shape considering ‘compactness’ or cellularity. Tumor volumes calculated assuming ellipsoid geometry were compared with direct, WMSS measurements. Results WMSS reported significantly larger T-size than conventional histology in the majority of cases [61.8%, 34/55; means = (2.34 cm; 1.99 cm), p  < 0.001], with a 16.4% (9/55) rate of ‘upstaging’. The majority of discordances were due to undersampling. T-size and volume were strongly correlated ( r  = 0.838, p  < 0.001). Significantly lower volume was obtained with WMSS versus ellipsoid modeling [means = (1.18 cm 3 ; 1.45 cm 3 ), p  < 0.001]. Conclusions Significantly larger T-size is measured with WMSS than conventionally, due primarily to undersampling in the latter. Volume and linear size are highly correlated. Diffuse tumors interspersed with normal or non-invasive elements may be sampled less extensively than more localized masses. The ellipsoid model overestimates tumor volume.