Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Xia, Longlong
• Lam, Shu Kee
• Wolf, Benjamin
• Kiese, Ralf
• Chen, Deli
• Butterbach‐Bahl, Klaus

Titel

Trade‐offs between soil carbon sequestration and reactive nitrogen losses under straw return in global agroecosystems

Ist Teil von

• Global change biology, 2018-12, Vol.24 (12), p.5919-5932

Ort / Verlag

England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Erscheinungsjahr

2018

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• It is widely recommended that crop straw be returned to croplands to maintain or increase soil carbon (C) storage in arable soils. However, because C and nitrogen (N) biogeochemical cycles are closely coupled, straw return may also affect soil reactive N (Nr) losses, but these effects remain uncertain, especially in terms of the interactions between soil C sequestration and Nr losses under straw addition. Here, we conducted a global meta‐analysis using 363 publications to assess the overall effects of straw return on soil Nr losses, C sequestration and crop productivity in agroecosystems. Our results show that on average, compared to mineral N fertilization, straw return with same amount of mineral N fertilizer significantly increased soil organic C (SOC) content (14.9%), crop yield (5.1%), and crop N uptake (10.9%). Moreover, Nr losses in the form of nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from rice paddies (17.3%), N leaching (8.7%), and runoff (25.6%) were significantly reduced, mainly due to enhanced microbial N immobilization. However, N2O emissions from upland fields (21.5%) and ammonia (NH3) emissions (17.0%) significantly increased following straw return, mainly due to the stimulation of nitrification/denitrification and soil urease activity. The increase in NH3 and N2O emissions was significantly and negatively correlated with straw C/N ratio and soil clay content. Regarding the interactions between C sequestration and Nr losses, the increase in SOC content following straw return was significantly and positively correlated with the decrease in N leaching and runoff. However, at a global scale, straw return increased net Nr losses from both rice and upland fields due to a greater stimulation of NH3 emissions than the reduction in N leaching and runoff. The trade‐offs between increased net Nr losses and soil C sequestration highlight the importance of reasonably managing straw return to soils to limit NH3 emissions without decreasing associated C sequestration potential. Straw return to croplands is widely recommended to increase soil C storage. However, because C and N cycles are tightly coupled, straw return also affects soil reactive N (Nr) losses, but these effects remain uncertain. Therefore, we use the method of meta‐analysis to address this knowledge gap. We found that straw return increased soil C sequestration, but simultaneously increased net Nr losses from global croplands due to greater stimulated NH3 emissions. This result highlights the importance of reasonably managing straw return to soils to limit NH3 emissions without decreasing associated C sequestration potential.