Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 8 von 48
Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2018-06, Vol.50 (6), p.1277-1284
2018

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Exercise Thresholds on Trial: Are They Really Equivalent?
Ist Teil von
  • Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2018-06, Vol.50 (6), p.1277-1284
Ort / Verlag
United States: American College of Sports Medicine
Erscheinungsjahr
2018
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
Alma/SFX Local Collection
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • PURPOSEThe interchangeable use of whole-body exercise thresholds and breakpoints (BP) in the local oxygenation response, as measured via near-infrared spectroscopy, has recently been questioned in scientific literature. Therefore, the present study aimed to longitudinally investigate the interrelationship of four commonly used exercise thresholdscritical power (CP), the respiratory compensation point (RCP), and BP in muscle (m[HHb]BP) and brain (c[O2Hb]BP) oxygenation. METHODSNine male participants (21.8 ± 1.2 yr) completed 6 wk of cycling interval training. Before and after this intervention period, subjects performed a ramp incremental exercise protocol to determine RCP, m[HHb]BP, and c[O2Hb]BP and four constant work rate (WR) tests to calculate CP. RESULTSWR associated with CP, RCP, m[HHB]BP, and c[O2Hb]BP increased by 7.7% ± 4.2%, 13.6% ± 9.0%, 9.8% ± 5.7%, and 11.3% ± 11.1%, respectively. CP was lower (pre260 ± 32 W, post280 ± 41 W; P < 0.05) than the WR associated with RCP (pre281 ± 28 W, post318 ± 36 W) and c[O2Hb]BP (pre283 ± 36 W, post313 ± 32 W) which occurred concomitantly (P = 0.683). M[HHb]BP occurred at the highest WR and differed from all others (pre313 ± 23 W, post344 ± 32 W; P < 0.05). Training-induced WR differences (ΔWR) did not contrast between thresholds, and initial parameter differences were not affected by the intervention (P = 0.253). Thresholds were partly correlated before (R = 0.67–0.85, P < 0.05) and after (R = 0.83–0.96, P < 0.05) training, but ΔWR values were not associated (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONSResults of the present study strongly question true equivalence of CP, RCP, m[HHb]BP, and c[O2Hb]BP during ramp incremental exercise. Therefore, these exercise thresholds should not be used interchangeably.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 0195-9131
eISSN: 1530-0315
DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001547
Titel-ID: cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1989556805
Format

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX