Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Modification of initial therapy in early and advanced Hodgkin lymphoma, based on interim PET/CT is beneficial: a prospective multicentre trial of 355 patients
Ist Teil von
British journal of haematology, 2017-09, Vol.178 (5), p.709-718
Ort / Verlag
England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Erscheinungsjahr
2017
Quelle
MEDLINE
Beschreibungen/Notizen
Summary
This multicentre study evaluated 5‐year progression‐free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in early and advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), where therapy was individualized based on initial prognostic factors and positron emission tomography‐computed tomography performed after two cycles (PET‐2). Between September 2006 and August 2013, 359 patients aged 18–60 years, were recruited in nine Israeli centres. Early‐HL patients initially received ABVD (adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) ×2. Depending on initial unfavourable prognostic features, PET‐2‐positive patients received additional ABVD followed by involved‐site radiotherapy (ISRT). Patients with negative PET‐2 and favourable disease received ISRT or ABVD ×2; those with unfavourable disease received ABVD ×2 with ISRT or, alternatively, ABVD ×4. Advanced‐HL patients initially received ABVD ×2 or escalated BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone; EB) ×2 based on their international prognostic score (≤2 or ≥3). PET‐2‐negative patients further received ABVD ×4; PET‐2‐positive patients received EB ×4 and ISRT to residual masses. With a median follow‐up of 55 (13–119) months, 5‐year PFS was 91% and 69% for PET‐2‐negative and positive early‐HL, respectively; 5‐year OS was 100% and 95%, respectively. For advanced‐HL, the PFS was 81% and 68%, respectively (P = 0·08); 5‐year OS was 98% and 91%, respectively. PET‐2 positivity is associated with inferior prognosis in early‐HL, even with additional ABVD and ISRT. Advanced‐HL patients benefit from therapy escalation following positive PET‐2. EB can be safely de‐escalated to ABVD in PET‐2‐negative patients.