Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Campbell, Steven
• Uzzo, Robert G
• Allaf, Mohamad E
• Bass, Eric B
• Cadeddu, Jeffrey A
• Chang, Anthony
• Clark, Peter E
• Davis, Brian J
• Derweesh, Ithaar H
• Giambarresi, Leo
• Gervais, Debra A
• Hu, Susie L
• Lane, Brian R
• Leibovich, Bradley C
• Pierorazio, Philip M

Titel

Renal Mass and Localized Renal Cancer: AUA Guideline

Ist Teil von

• The Journal of urology, 2017-09, Vol.198 (3), p.520-529

Ort / Verlag

United States: Elsevier Inc

Erscheinungsjahr

2017

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Purpose This AUA Guideline focuses on evaluation/counseling and management of adult patients with clinically localized renal masses suspicious for cancer, including solid-enhancing tumors and Bosniak 3/4 complex-cystic lesions. Materials and Methods Systematic review utilized research from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and additional supplementation by the authors and consultant methodologists. Evidence-based statements were based on body of evidence strength Grade A/B/C (Strong/Moderate/Conditional Recommendations, respectively) with additional statements presented as Clinical Principles or Expert Opinions. Results Great progress has been made since the previous guidelines on management of localized renal masses was released (2009). The current guidelines provide updated, evidence-based recommendations regarding evaluation/counseling of patients with clinically localized renal masses, including the evolving role of renal mass biopsy. Given great variability of clinical, oncologic and functional characteristics, index patients are not utilized and the panel advocates individualized counseling/management. Management options (partial nephrectomy/radical nephrectomy/thermal ablation/active surveillance) are reviewed including recent data about comparative effectiveness and potential morbidities. Oncologic issues are prioritized while recognizing that functional outcomes are of great importance for survivorship for most patients with localized kidney cancer. A more restricted role for radical nephrectomy is recommended following well-defined selection criteria. Priority for partial nephrectomy is recommended for clinical T1a lesions, along with selective use of thermal ablation, particularly for tumors ≤3.0 cm. Important considerations for shared decision-making about active surveillance are explicitly defined. Conclusions Several factors should be considered during counseling/management of patients with clinically localized renal masses, including general health/comorbidities, oncologic potential of the mass, pertinent functional issues and relative efficacy/potential morbidities of various management strategies.