Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Delanois, Ronald E., MD
• Gwam, Chukwuweike U., MD
• Mohamed, Nequesha, MD
• Khlopas, Anton, MD
• Chughtai, Morad, MD
• Malkani, Arthur L., MD
• Mont, Michael A., MD

Titel

Midterm Outcomes of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With the Use of a Multihole Highly-Porous Titanium Shell

Ist Teil von

• The Journal of arthroplasty, 2017-09, Vol.32 (9), p.2806-2809

Ort / Verlag

United States: Elsevier Inc

Erscheinungsjahr

2017

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Abstract Background We are reporting on the minimum 5-year outcomes of patients who underwent revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a specific highly-porous titanium shell. We assessed (1) aseptic and all-cause survivorship; (2) functional outcomes; (3) complications; and (4) radiographic outcomes. Methods Two hospital databases were evaluated for patients who underwent revision THA due to component instability or aseptic loosening using a cementless highly-porous titanium shell between September 2006 and December 2011. This yielded 35 patients who had a mean age of 61 years (range 14-88 years). Patients had a mean follow-up of 6 years (minimum 5 years). All-cause and aseptic survivorship of the shell was calculated. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Harris Hip Score. We determined the incidence of postoperative complications and performed radiographic evaluation of pelvic radiographs from regular office visits. Result The aseptic survivorship of the acetabular component was 97% (95% confidence interval; 8.1-9.5). The all-cause survivorship of the acetabular component was 91% (95% confidence interval; 7.3-8.1). One patient had an aseptic failure and 2 patients had septic failures. The mean postoperative Harris Hip Score was 76 points (range, 61-91 points). Excluding the aseptic and septic failures, there was no osteolysis or progressive radiolucencies present on radiographic evaluation at final follow-up. Conclusion At a minimum of 5-year follow-up, the highly-porous titanium acetabular revision shell has excellent survivorship and functional outcomes. Although long-term follow-up is needed to further monitor these implants, the results are promising and demonstrate that this prosthesis may be an excellent option for patients undergoing revision THA.