Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Demirci, Ayşe
• Alkış, Necati
• Dane, Faysal
• Durnalı, Ayşe
• Yazıcı, Ömer Kamil
• Rzayev, Rashad
• Kaya, Serap
• Yazılıtaş, Doğan
• İnanç, Mevlüde
• Özçelik, Melike
• Akman, Tülay
• Kaplan, Mehmet Ali
• Günaydın, Yusuf
• Ulaş, Arife
• Sönmez, Özlem
• Tokluoğlu, Saadet
• Gököz Doğu, Gamze
• Bal, Öznur
• Gümüş, Mahmut

Titel

Retrospective evaluation of premenopausal hormone‐sensitive breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant gonadotropin‐releasing hormone analogue: Anatolian Society of Medical Oncology (ASMO) study

Ist Teil von

• Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology, 2018-04, Vol.14 (2), p.e145-e151

Ort / Verlag

Australia: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc

Erscheinungsjahr

2018

Link zum Volltext

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Aim The goal of this study is to evaluate possible factors affecting the survival of patients treated with gonadotropin‐releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues. Methods Demographic characteristics, treatment modalities, overall survival (OS) and the possible factors affecting the survival a total of 554 premenopausal breast cancer patients in Turkey evaluated retrospectively. Results The median duration of GnRH analogues use was 22 ± 13.6 (range, 1–87) months. Patients were divided into three groups according to the duration of GNRH analogues use; 4–12 months (Group A), 13–24 months (Group B) and ≥25 months (Group C). Overall, 530 patients were analyzed; 23.2%, 45.8%, 30.9% of the patients were in Group A, B and C, respectively. The median follow‐up duration was 34 ± 30.3 (range, 4–188) months. The OS in patients ≤35 years of age was found to be significantly longer than that of patients >35 years of age in Group B (log rank, P = 0.023). The disease‐free survival of the patients in Group A was significantly shorter than that of patients in Group C (log rank, P = 0.003). The OS of Group A patients was significantly shorter in comparison to that of Group B and Group C patients (log rank, P = 0.000) and the OS of Group B patients was significantly shorter than Group C (log rank, P = 0,000). Conclusion There is currently no definite data on the optimal duration of GnRH analogues use. One of the important results of this study that will provide an insight to the future studies is the improvement gained in OS by the increase in the duration of GnRH analogues use.