Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Van Hecke, Ann
• Heinen, Maud
• Fernández‐Ortega, Paz
• Graue, Marit
• Hendriks, Jeroen M.L.
• Høy, Bente
• Köpke, Sascha
• Lithner, Maria
• Van Gaal, Betsie G.I.

Titel

Systematic literature review on effectiveness of self‐management support interventions in patients with chronic conditions and low socio‐economic status

Ist Teil von

• Journal of advanced nursing, 2017-04, Vol.73 (4), p.775-793

Ort / Verlag

England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc

Erscheinungsjahr

2017

Quelle

Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Aim To assess the quality of evidence and determine the effect of patient‐related and economic outcomes of self‐management support interventions in chronically ill patients with a low socio‐economic status. Background Integrated evidence on self‐management support interventions in chronically ill people with low socio‐economic status is lacking. Design Systematic literature review. Data sources Cochrane database of trials, PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycINFO and Joanna Briggs Institute Library were searched (2000–2013). Randomized controlled trials addressing self‐management support interventions for patients with cardiovascular disease, stroke, cancer, diabetes and/or chronic respiratory disease were included. Review methods Data extraction and quality assessment were performed by independent researchers using a data extraction form. Results Studies (n = 27) focused mainly on diabetes. Fourteen studies cited an underlying theoretical basis. Most frequently used self‐management support components were lifestyle advice, information provision and symptom management. Problem‐solving and goal‐setting strategies were frequently integrated. Eleven studies adapted interventions to the needs of patients with a low socio‐economic status. No differences were found for interventions developed based on health behaviour theoretical models. Conclusion Limited evidence was found for self‐management support interventions in chronically ill patients with low socio‐economic status. Essential characteristics and component(s) of effective self‐management support interventions for these patients could not be detected. Rigorous reporting on development and underlying theories in the intervention is recommended.