Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 4 von 11633
Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.), 2017-05, Vol.63 (5), p.963-972
2017
Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Waste, Leaks, and Failures in the Biomarker Pipeline
Ist Teil von
  • Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.), 2017-05, Vol.63 (5), p.963-972
Ort / Verlag
England: American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc
Erscheinungsjahr
2017
Quelle
Oxford Journals 2020 Medicine
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • The large, expanding literature on biomarkers is characterized by almost ubiquitous significant results, with claims about the potential importance, but few of these discovered biomarkers are used in routine clinical care. The pipeline of biomarker development includes several specific stages: discovery, validation, clinical translation, evaluation, implementation (and, in the case of nonutility, deimplementation). Each of these stages can be plagued by problems that cause failures of the overall pipeline. Some problems are nonspecific challenges for all biomedical investigation, while others are specific to the peculiarities of biomarker research. Discovery suffers from poor methods and incomplete and selective reporting. External independent validation is limited. Selection for clinical translation is often shaped by nonrational choices. Evaluation is sparse and the clinical utility of many biomarkers remains unknown. The regulatory environment for biomarkers remains weak and guidelines can reach biased or divergent recommendations. Removing inefficient or even harmful biomarkers that have been entrenched in clinical care can meet with major resistance. The current biomarker pipeline is too prone to failures. Consideration of clinical needs should become a starting point for the development of biomarkers. Improvements can include the use of more stringent methodology, better reporting, larger collaborative studies, careful external independent validation, preregistration, rigorous systematic reviews and umbrella reviews, pivotal randomized trials, and implementation and deimplementation studies. Incentives should be aligned toward delivering useful biomarkers.

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX