Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Bjerke, Benjamin T., MD, MS
• Zuchelli, Daniel M., BS
• Nemani, Venu M., MD, PhD
• Emerson, Ronald G., MD
• Kim, Han Jo, MD
• Boachie-Adjei, Oheneba, MD

Titel

Prognosis of Significant Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring Events in Severe Spinal Deformity Surgery

Ist Teil von

• Spine deformity, 2017-03, Vol.5 (2), p.117-123

Ort / Verlag

Cham: Elsevier Inc

Erscheinungsjahr

2017

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Abstract Background Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring has become a standard tool for mitigating neurologic injury during spinal deformity surgery. Significant monitoring changes during deformity correction are relatively uncommon. This study characterizes precipitating factors for neurologic injury and relates significant events and postoperative neurologic prognosis. Methods All spinal deformity surgeries at a West African hospital over a 12-month period were reviewed. Patients were included if complete operative reports, monitoring data, and postoperative neurologic examinations were available for review. Surgical and systemic triggers of monitoring events were recorded and neurologic status was followed for 6 weeks postoperatively. Results Eighty-eight patients met inclusion criteria. The average age was 14 years (3–28). The average kyphosis was 108° (54°–176°) and average scoliosis was 100° (48°–177°). There were 44 separate neurologic events in 34 patients (39%). The most common triggers were traction or positioning (16), posterior column osteotomies/vertebral column resections (9/1), and distraction, corrective maneuvers, or implant placement (12). On surgery completion, 100% (12/12) of events from non-osteotomy-related surgical procedures, 75% (12/16) of events from traction or positioning resolved; however, 0% (0/10) of events from osteotomies resolved completely. Eight percent (7/88) had new neurologic deficits postoperatively, all with intraoperative monitoring changes. In 6 of these 7 patients, the event was attributed to an osteotomy; in 1 patient the cause was not determined. At 6-week follow-up, all patients had some preserved motor function bilaterally with the ability to walk (ASIA D/E) or recovered completely. Conclusions Intraoperative signal changes were most frequently from traction or positioning. However, the most common cause of persistent neurologic deterioration and the only cause of postoperative neurologic deficit was the performance of osteotomies. Unlike traction- or instrument-related correction, osteotomies produce irreversible changes, from canal intrusion or sudden localized deformity change. The incidence of postoperative neurologic deficit is very low when the inciting cause is reversed; however, osteotomy-related events are irreversible, with a high incidence of associated lasting neurologic injury.